[tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-briscoe-tcpm-syn-op-sis-02
Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Mon, 22 September 2014 20:45 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBAF1A1AC1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWWZbYDDuvUj for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hubrelay-rd.bt.com (hubrelay-rd.bt.com [62.239.224.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8841A1AC6 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHR71-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.109) by EVMHR68-UKRD.bt.com (10.187.101.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0100
Received: from EPHR01-UKIP.domain1.systemhost.net (147.149.196.177) by EVMHR71-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0100
Received: from bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (132.146.168.158) by EPHR01-UKIP.domain1.systemhost.net (147.149.196.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:45:37 +0100
Received: from BTP075694.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.111.37.220]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id s8MKjZdD002071; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:45:36 +0100
Message-ID: <201409222045.s8MKjZdD002071@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:55:42 +0100
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/KF6s_6ma-3T9W_IWY16x3BZodxg
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-briscoe-tcpm-syn-op-sis-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:45:46 -0000
Joe, I've just posted a revision here: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tcpm-syn-op-sis-02> * I've taken more care to explain it. It was a bit terse before. So it's ready for the list to review properly now. It would be useful if someone wrote a comparison with the other ideas on how to do this, including the ones we wrote jointly and SLO, LOIC and DBormam's 4-way HS. Better someone independent of all the authors does this. But I want to get syn-op-sis right first, a comparison won't be much use until its stable. The underlying idea is still the same. The reasons I've updated it are many (the change log taken from the appendix is pasted at the end of this email for convenience). * Mainly I've articulated that all these approaches that add TCP options after the Data Offset are not just hacks to get more space; they add a new architectural capability to TCP - a distinction between TCP options that might be relevant to middleboxes, and ones that are only for the destination (a bit like destopt in IPv6 - needing to specify which TCP options are for the destination only is ironic but necessary). * I've also realised that this approach will ultimately return to a single SYN solution, whereas both the ideas in draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-syn-ext-opt will always require two SYNs. Bob Pasted from the change log: From briscoe...-01 to briscoe...-02: Technical changes: * Defined the client behaviour dependent on which response arrives first. * Allowed retransmission of either SYN or SYN-U if no response from either. * Redefined EOO as an offset from the end of the packet, not from the beginning of the payload. * Added section on Migration to a Single Handshake. Reworded dual handshake so that it is not mandatory for the client to send dual SYNs simultaneously; only the relation between the SYNs and the response to either is mandatory, while parallel SYNs is purely for latency reduction. * Added rules for writing TCP options, i.e. i) options like TFO MUST NOT be located in the TCP header and ii) add no-ops to align on 4-octet boundary. * Added rules for forwarding TCP options, i.e. only the destination looks for TCP options after the Data Offset, not middleboxes. * Moved the Explicit Handshake variant (SYN-L) into the body from the appendix, and recommended the choice could be down to implementers or apps. Included section on corner cases. * Introduced more normative language throughout the Protocol Spec. Editorial changes: * Added temporary motivation section * Added confusible terminology to Terminology section. * Divided protocol spec into sub-sections. * Handshake table: Clarified that the two columns under each server represent separate threads, that may run on separate servers, without co-ordination. Represented message dependencies in the alignment of the rows. * Explained the table. * Explained why a legacy server won't ever pass SYN-U to the app. * More precisely described loss as 'not arrived before a timeout', and explained the tradeoff between latency and extra TCP options. * Gave reasoning for locating TCP options in three groups. * Acknowledged Rob Hancock for the architectural idea of hiding an extension to a protocol in the layer above. * Appendix about protocol alternatives now only presents the SYN- UD alternative, given the implicit/explicit handshake choice has been moved to the body. * Rewrote appendix about comparing the choices to treat the two pairs of choices separately, rather than discussing all four combinations of pairs of choices. ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT
- [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-bris… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] draft-briscoe-tcpm-syn-op-sis-02 John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Zimmermann, Alexander
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Scharf, Michael (Michael)
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… John Leslie
- Re: [tcpm] More TCP option space in a SYN: draft-… Bob Briscoe