IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] [IPv6] [IPFIX] errata eid7775 RE: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG LC: IPFIX documents

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Tue, 06 February 2024 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC677C14F6AA; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:24:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQq-CTmm7MFu; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24CADC14F680; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83862370C; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:24:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=hzkagyeZWXjZ5JLPPvFpj8fPA6K1SqZB 5MZw27Ls4lA=; b=XVgy/jalyFrTKdDM9DuhmIqQM7zfhiLdOwV0B/9ZFA4VkpAo 7U2dPzGkDFPAOt0236YSc83Bw0/SuEx2CUJlfqv/2t37WuvC53weDx706l+J74Ty 8jZZ0Guy92Nh6C/gYaf/d4gAYG+OwARf+3jJQvWbxafBdbNhgIXKBgFwGl8=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D269B2370B; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:24:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-lf1-f43.google.com (unknown [209.85.167.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4CFB23706; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:24:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-lf1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511490772f6so14221e87.2; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:24:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuqrdXZMufzltXD2dX+576FIEjeuEHpHkCQgcZk5haunWzWkVs 4rVKLaTUAHkhDnvG25hBQw1JIoMM1uMkXC/PP7OLHotJTtMx6oVSNty9haqUXaam3A0TZcohSRj BxabdSL0B1hPius1TigZPrpxXOas=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGOvlk4ssu7jn4Yri7HaJnZQFslfBVLE/d4n4vzrTHl/kxEYKHpW+eoNcKDfo5VnOP9egAaI5BX9Jel3B7qy3M=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c46:0:b0:511:4eb3:8ef9 with SMTP id i6-20020a198c46000000b005114eb38ef9mr2541700lfj.5.1707261848397; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:24:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN9PR11MB53716555BC4D0F4FB8921408B890A@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2d9602ce-6eb5-4667-b1c9-3db74590f352@ciena.com> <DU2PR02MB10160C3A2EC2AD4B08EA0C6D488742@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <7da20efd-b7a2-44e7-9031-0f35b9ea837b@ciena.com> <DU2PR02MB101608C2847178159CA1C540E88742@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <ca39adfb-2738-0d69-01ee-01437a6fd9f5@huawei.com> <SA3PR19MB8011E45ECEDA5FA9904CEC04F0472@SA3PR19MB8011.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <13e9edb0-33af-f2d7-fff2-fe1e0804cfa2@huawei.com> <349F35FB-EA76-42BA-A409-6690D3180FAB@gmail.com> <f3bad7b7-3d7b-c2d6-80d6-dde578d3c0fc@huawei.com> <5A996FAF-D71B-4CAD-BC0C-6216A918B410@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A996FAF-D71B-4CAD-BC0C-6216A918B410@gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:23:55 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VE1c=7v4ZsXd9bsZ0UjCdY_Kw6BA-Mkt2YvyPXxB5+oQA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VE1c=7v4ZsXd9bsZ0UjCdY_Kw6BA-Mkt2YvyPXxB5+oQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Andrew Feren <andrew.feren@plixer.com>, "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "Aitken, Paul" <paitken@ciena.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000032ffa0610bee079"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D508F954-C546-11EE-954D-A19503B9AAD1-06080547!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/LWUGQ4XQ7Xx5bjnrUcQ6cFZSdJQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 09:06:16 -0800
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] [IPv6] [IPFIX] errata eid7775 RE: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG LC: IPFIX documents
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 23:24:23 -0000

Please padron an interruption from the gallery, but:

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:49 PM Bob Hinden wrote:

> I would put it differently.    Anyone can report an errata, the Area
> Directors make the decision if the errata is accepted.   That may including
> checking with the authors.   They do not check with the company where the
> authors worked at the time the RFC was published.
>

If the RFC documents a proprietary protocol, it seems to me that it would
be insane for the ADs not to check with the organization that controls that
protocol.

Mike Heard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email