IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] IPR check for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-22

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9163A3F3E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 09:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xraBLAKdgPg1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 09:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B7E3A3F41 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB1C25A13; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:37:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1621269466; bh=1FoH+/5UrLGtMy5nvA/RTiffEVgz/hQoWUrRS0roBrE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=y5QVQZXI+azzJzhoIS6kfJ7mTS5i6+2fwYa5Ja2sInmB5UES8vkKkDddwDSzn1X7w 1UeE/pYAKo+ivcL66Ah/s3iEO+FWWgmIJgCvxfAi4a2xXX7RZHK1UbZlB0HSlvoFUj qA2N/4mr+jdJXpwNA3p809t2kjOxVJuJc0mQTP8Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKCC95rOa44M; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8202.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.48.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.165) by rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (134.108.48.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:37:45 +0200
Received: from rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0]) by rznt8202.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::aca4:171a:3ee1:57e0%3]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.014; Mon, 17 May 2021 18:37:45 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR check for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-22
Thread-Index: AddLOI5hyf2lcO9UTyWSP36Jsxeg5g==
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37:45 +0000
Message-ID: <cbc909ae00c349298e4db5a7aaba0558@hs-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.140.248]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/MOveUO9w1D2fjXcJJ7oT7crenf4>
Subject: [tcpm] IPR check for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-22
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:37:53 -0000

Wes, all,

In preparation of the shepherd write-up, the formal IPR check is required. Given the importance of 793bis, I run the IPR check on the TCPM mailing list.

@Wes as editor: Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed.

Section 7 in draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-22 acknowledges work from at least 40 contributors to the TCPM working group. Given that 793bis is not intended to change the TCP protocol as compared to existing standards, I don't believe that IPR conformations are required from everybody who ever contributed text to 793bis. I assume that each TCPM contributor knows the IETF Note Well very well.

Thanks

Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email