[tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01.txt

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 10 June 2014 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCDD1A019B for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0qqUqYtC-af for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803::53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8167F1A0040 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68B0A27816D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 02:09:07 +0900 (JST)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q59so2576629wes.12 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.157.226 with SMTP id wp2mr19904513wjb.66.1402420145035; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.88.102 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140610070403.28813.97293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20140610070403.28813.97293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:09:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO249yfmVcBLGreFvNk+-hGhy6v6hDyhMoc+V5ttR=QSiH4rOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122f54892230704fb7e6221"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Mru8oDand9TMBvTVu3HJ_ystt68
Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:09:11 -0000

Hi,
I've just submitted a new version of my draft. It discusses reducing the
use of TS option in segments.
Also, it includes some discussions for feature negotiation using non-SYN
segments. Although I don't say late feature negotiation is possible in all
cases, but I still believe it will be possible for some features like this
by adding some simple logics.

I'm not very sure if this is the right approach, but I would like to
explore this so that we can find something useful.
I really appreciate your feedback.

Regards,
--
Yoshi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:04 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01.txt
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@wide.ad.jp>



A new version of I-D, draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yoshifumi Nishida and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws
Revision:       01
Title:          A-PAWS: Alternative Approach for PAWS
Document date:  2014-06-10
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          11
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nishida-tcpm-apaws-01

Abstract:
   This documents describe a technique called A-PAWS which can provide
   protection against old duplicates segments like PAWS.  While PAWS
   requires TCP to set timestamp options in all segments in a TCP
   connection, A-PAWS supports the same feature without using
   timestamps.  A-PAWS is designed to be used complementary with PAWS.
   TCP needs to use PAWS when it is necessary and activates A-PAWS only
   when it is safe to use.  Without impairing the reliability and the
   robustness of TCP, A-PAWS can provide more option space to other TCP
   extensions.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat