IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-fast-open

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 11 March 2013 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B5E21F8DD5 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWYOTDotKst6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C353521F8DC5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2BJucmD024284 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:56:38 -0400
Received: (qmail 12431 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2013 19:56:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.34?) (wes@mti-systems.com@46.165.196.138) by 0 with ESMTPA; 11 Mar 2013 19:56:37 -0000
Message-ID: <513E36D5.3040701@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:56:05 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
References: <2A886F9088894347A3BE0CC5B7A85F3E9AB12A6BDF@FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAK6E8=e1wS+B72E1cP2af=XPbV2HDyjS5xmgQkskp5gvuhG_QQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=e1wS+B72E1cP2af=XPbV2HDyjS5xmgQkskp5gvuhG_QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-fast-open
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:56:40 -0000

On 3/11/2013 3:29 PM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> 
>     * General: This draft is heading for experimental track. Recent IESG
>     feedback suggests that the IESG is interested in statements about
>     the scope of such experiment. Maybe some text on that could be
>     added? (Very obvious is further real-world experince on the
>     performance benefit.)
> 
>  
> I need some help on this text. maybe an example exp RFC that exactly
> scopes its experiment.  
>  


One example I can give you is the LEDBAT spec:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6817/

See section 5.

It gives a summary of what some of the open questions were that the
WG felt were interesting, and what to look for while using LEDBAT.

(I don't know what the FastOpen document does/doesn't say at the
moment, but do know that the LEDBAT one was "good enough" for the
IESG at the time ... which was relatively recently)

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email