IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options-00.txt

Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E721F86F6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hw+ro6fAPMba for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553E21F86DD for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywt34 with SMTP id 34so6877101ywt.31 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=8WlxaXrDsNiprvPWnTS1Sydb5HwP9sPGzSmBHgTohS8=; b=XXxZjt2/Cv0r2hYsIZT3qZa54MeLvcqbO0loDN6xpwRD4dBC3Hu+QHguL3fovUVpMj 32fWU0cpzw982iRB0PWw==
Received: by 10.224.73.4 with SMTP id o4mr17208363qaj.62.1321391214297; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.73.4 with SMTP id o4mr17208353qaj.62.1321391214139; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.54.137 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPshTCgHgXa5P080dtDbPbPN8c2d0yZBr1d+ZgUHf3hOg+i8UQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20111024215310.10139.23464.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EA5DF5F.8090407@isi.edu> <CAPshTCgHgXa5P080dtDbPbPN8c2d0yZBr1d+ZgUHf3hOg+i8UQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=dXJaLzCLgv=qr1222HC00DwVNZ2+fLQGOiJjcQq4KD2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:06:55 -0000

I also support this draft and have similar comments to Jerry's plus:

If we expect running implementations, shouldn't the target status be standard?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email