[tcpm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5961 (5068)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 20 April 2020 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5BE3A084A; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Aa8buWvv8VO; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5393A0848; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3E7D7F406D5; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: wes@mti-systems.com, ananth@cisco.com, randall@lakerest.net, mdalal@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200420145310.3E7D7F406D5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:53:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Ox9_hldERbX0mHTa_iH2XxTpE3I>
Subject: [tcpm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5961 (5068)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:53:16 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC5961, "Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5068 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Date Reported: 2017-07-12 Held by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- [RFC0793] currently requires handling of a segment with the RST bit when in a synchronized state to be processed as follows: Corrected Text -------------- [RFC0793] currently requires handling of a segment with the RST bit when not in SYN-SENT to be processed as follows: Notes ----- The text in section 3.2 begins by stating a change from RFC 793 for RST bit handling "when in a synchronized state" (which means all states except for LISTEN, SYN-SENT, and SYN-RECEIVED). Section 3.4 of RFC 793 refers to "all states but SYN-SENT", so the description of RFC 793 is inaccurate. -------------------------------------- RFC5961 (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : A. Ramaiah, R. Stewart, M. Dalal Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tcpm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5961 … RFC Errata System