[tcpm] Re: Adoption call for draft-bonica-tcpm-tcp-ao-algs-00

Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> Mon, 27 April 2026 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53860E41B7B4; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777311137; bh=dqbPDZGWCBrqwuLHCjiDDSAMyXdGOKO4bcpI9gwQ8Cs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=cqGCxabtvtoi8TXlt8nYhPz4SvOakZ+Omcp7rvAW65JigWCb8MqPLMB1ARJbl3Due AKPS4OaBmF2xgg9h+2xqOTJcIjzt9uTmL51olT4GELSBIO4YmQYwFLZMFqIToTKK1Q k5p7O/n4JRKTb9YaMlyfhq9lSqKnT8y5c3nX3Qoo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3oQK-X80Ttpc; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de [212.201.120.206]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE59E41B7A5; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de [185.149.215.227]) by mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A17E0355; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:32:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip1f100e7a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [31.16.14.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tuexen) by mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BADEB1A0048; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:32:07 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FDD2AF3D-9346-48E4-93BB-A8F4DF1421A2"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <D011DBFF-E9FA-4C79-BEA4-3F2613269063@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:32:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B76383FC-9967-482E-9128-5C26270BCD32@fh-muenster.de>
References: <D011DBFF-E9FA-4C79-BEA4-3F2613269063@fh-muenster.de>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181)
Message-ID-Hash: 4HHEBQNVN5N2ATNMOFEMJO2F2MIMYLR6
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4HHEBQNVN5N2ATNMOFEMJO2F2MIMYLR6
X-MailFrom: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tcpm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tcpm] Re: Adoption call for draft-bonica-tcpm-tcp-ao-algs-00
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/PdoeU_kEAnUcFH-8FI78u0LA7ew>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tcpm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tcpm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tcpm-leave@ietf.org>

> On 30. Mar 2026, at 16:51, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> this mail starts the adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-tcpm-tcp-ao-algs/
> 
> Please note that we plan to get input from the security area on
> the specific algorithms to be used. The document is intended
> to provide modern algorithms which do not require the increase of
> the TCP option space.
> 
> Please send your comments to the mailing list before April 13th.
Dear all,

I think we have rough consensus to adopt this document.

Authors: please submit a new revision draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-algs-00.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Thank you very much for your cooperation.
> 
> The TCPM co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list -- tcpm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tcpm-leave@ietf.org