Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5961 (4772)

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2016 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB3712D81C for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFqsFro_f46l for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF4712D800 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id h186so160328pfg.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VoDHKn+lxxgNTnXNpGBY23w+N7ezsHmldfr9PrBhoWE=; b=T8ZYETyYlerVFZUAj9IlTu3pkpRkq9ikp67NG4sXbOgFkYetrq8AlXW7CkppF9oWYR S1F2vZLsZBD7d4jtB7rZbeXzITR0PhI6vZ4eSLtH8EKf1wVY/3iLnNtiQtVY5BgfOYl5 1fcK0dt4CgTpzPsP/zKNjEjJGC/G+ou4xe4B9uhhHVIIBew7CyjnAmRHqvucbwP8jFsK /alG7PGCnhNp82RBZk6TOzEE5HCpFWbgrY1fsunNlLfCNEzSyn+NG2QR8syh1+GuvQ40 Ah15id3tiIWhx8v34UtR3aJJyBMmN1s5DZEByGMwl7jJHKV2aKwEDqqP6nmm3pQsu+5O qH5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VoDHKn+lxxgNTnXNpGBY23w+N7ezsHmldfr9PrBhoWE=; b=Z9b4pLnVOZK3xCNS79jh40mV87UAOv9nUgTQovnmIfum/YM7iWOL6wM/4f8YK9qoCZ ZttobPf80Q0iI5AhHLOxBCRn5I487HOTe2SOBmP19CcE6TYt+eEqU64y88kFj2rZB/Rg ZQwtz6KOy66YMtDiydj6Eq6IRrL7fU0Z7+6SozXYSVwVXGGeV4sdgxTRVPSABsNkylBE w7KylDx0i8yzYz71LEG0ZY5CzwxEqR3bjOgNgJabKnqXTfg373DYmITv4brh1x0FG/m4 P6WsjQitpeumJ0RlERWh4EoUm9wTPzjoTsYFEG/4663uRgioZOlW2e3UytrFrWoNnP/V +/Kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuoKSOBvq9ZzRBIh7zINfPvhU1vFimwOE9m+GdzW8pY2v9Bzo4GWBvZNwNQlJTBxi1RMxPAxV8jQZ3peg==
X-Received: by 10.98.47.132 with SMTP id v126mr18944882pfv.152.1470932872186; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.142.133 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160810183654.05358B80C3A@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160810183654.05358B80C3A@rfc-editor.org>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 20:27:51 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwTogyBXLYdjHrrnM3-Uz2wpSX31eZg+GJwUP5LBnqu=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Rqbs_n6xbFE_v6_vS1FMt88JgfE>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5961 (4772)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:27:54 -0000

I submitted this draft, yesterday.:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-ack-throttling-02

It's a work-in-progress, but I welcome feedback.


On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5961,
> "Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5961&eid=4772
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
>
> Section: 7
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> [The entire section]
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> No suggested text because it requires a much more serious analysis.
> May be adding that the rate-limit counter SHOULD be per-connection,
> in the spirit of RFC 6528?
>
> Notes
> -----
> It appears the section does not specify that the counter for ACK throttling SHOULD be per-connection. In Linux, it is apparently global, which allowed its use as a side channel enabling nasty attacks (CVE-2016-5696 and the paper "Off-Path TCP Exploits: Global Rate Limit Considered Dangerous" <http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~zhiyunq/pub/sec16_TCP_pure_offpath.pdf>)
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5961 (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks
> Publication Date    : August 2010
> Author(s)           : A. Ramaiah, R. Stewart, M. Dalal
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>