[tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segment after the SYN?
Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 28 September 2006 03:08 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSmGB-0005pM-KP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:08:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSmGB-0005pC-1y for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:08:27 -0400
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net ([201.216.232.80]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSmG8-0008UQ-LY for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:08:27 -0400
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA54F0C9D3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:13:01 -0300 (ART)
Received: from fgont.gont.com.ar (171-180-231-201.fibertel.com.ar [201.231.180.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8S38IeY011125 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:08:28 -0300
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060927231914.08095ec0@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:28:10 -0300
To: tcpm@ietf.org
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Subject: [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segment after the SYN?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Folks, Caitlin Bestler proposed that a host implementing the UTO SHOULD send an UTO on the first (data?) packet after the SYN. This avoids requiring systems to keep UTO-related information for connections that have not yet been established. And would likely make things work better in the presence of mechanisms such as SYN cookies. We would like to hear what others think on this issue. Thanks! -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 _______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Caitlin Bestler
- [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segment a… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segme… Gorry Fairhurst
- RE: [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segme… Caitlin Bestler
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Mahdavi, Jamshid
- RE: [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segme… Caitlin Bestler
- Re: [tcpm] UTO: SHOULD send option in first segme… Gorry Fairhurst
- [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first segme… Mahdavi, Jamshid
- Re: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Fernando Gont
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Caitlin Bestler
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Mahdavi, Jamshid
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Fernando Gont
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Fernando Gont
- RE: [tcpm] Re: UTO: SHOULD send option in first s… Mahdavi, Jamshid