IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo-13

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 19 August 2023 03:45 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E08C14CEED for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HdEpH4Dqnyg for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA86C14CEE3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I12ABEeUchpXxzjhEXSz8pS1UmXteplkOEVnbbSU+1c=; b=DEy+CYfB/ELlNJKEjxSCXmQv2p j9bcYuPE3V0SiYpyq/ZZK9fm3xZSjB9ea6ZFFymgM8jQnpCmidc0BZaYHwI1dRcaHukbYOMFkd5EQ 87l7IYJrBfl2MhnY9Uw3yqA+fiA453euBz7woVemXYy5QYtMB6C8CJPzNGjI+tQEFOQXCOndbgKqf FQ2hlrSUaJPhYg9rPP/nvDCo0thZImJP9DdNaxBGGftpTU4p4hIvBtsVLy/XPXScCZ8pc/aTw73KL LjN4+R7WYy/8JVcM0md/q1crqKQZXMdvnsTxPLVXc6SZhly3HRos8vSZuZSlz/S42JMKl0nvV/KK9 lrhCmqVA==;
Received: from [172.58.208.80] (port=4535 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1qXCtX-00Btt9-2a; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 23:45:04 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9DABCF8B-2833-4341-9C73-68148C76822D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <963E4288-FC88-4931-8EC2-354199E1C014@strayalpha.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:44:47 -0700
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "Nishida, Yoshi" <nyoshif@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <91F93D9A-3C45-4A02-A3A6-52055D18FCBF@strayalpha.com>
References: <D14E8883-0CC5-4A39-8C1F-F9B62FDACA41@amazon.co.jp> <963E4288-FC88-4931-8EC2-354199E1C014@strayalpha.com>
To: "Iwashima, Kuniyuki" <kuniyu=40amazon.co.jp@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Ti22Y6XF6NdnBjkCFUPasB3SVnA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo-13
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 03:45:10 -0000

PS...

> On Aug 18, 2023, at 8:34 PM, touch@strayalpha.com wrote:
> 
>> In the situation above, the server side (SYN_RECV) "has not been
>> negotiated" EDO yet because of (2), and I read the following part
>> as "option MUST be ignored"
> 
> The server side has not yet successfully negotiated EDO because it is not in ESTABLISHED yet. So it MUST ignore EDO Established.

Skip the above. It’s not correct - but also doesn’t matter (see later in the post)

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email