[tcpm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Block on charter-ietf-tcpm-09-00: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-tcpm-09-00: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tcpm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While we are rechartering both TCPM and TSVWG, I am wondering if we should take
this opportunity to get rid of the following from the TCM charter -

   The focus of the working group is TCP. In cases where small
changes are directly applicable to other transports (e.g., SCTP or
DCCP), the mappings to other transports may be specified alongside
that for TCP, but other significant additions and changes to other
transports are not in scope.

is there any planned work that impacts "other transports"? if now then we don't
need this provision for future work. If the comes up we can very well do that
in TSVWG.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think we should put the current milestone in the new charter.