Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggregation draft
Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 July 2023 08:07 UTC
Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447E8C151086 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 01:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hg1u3gkdmR9P for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 01:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x30.google.com (mail-oa1-x30.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703CFC15107E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 01:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x30.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1b056276889so1523929fac.2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 01:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688717228; x=1691309228; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ACFyZ5erGqi6On+j4YOrIfu9YLZK6YDxXX5v+hYXvxM=; b=k6B0y3qyfk8npGzVL2Au5R42e2AnkoZs0h3RG4QkHMKgUm/Ia901EPjoyx7zFWn3nr 2UdlCxp2R5JiOFeqX+EjD4rb7KGW7hav3NZC/o1j6c437cVtv0qqpJa08FFR3n0Mb8To IeELvWwPscQycPdMiUBIF+H9VnkU5SHrc+pORJMeJCuO7EvcCQkqU/5rTmRlrQvmpo+K 26CszNDoJdfg3llmEBTlKIfIlugaEyG+zhtYndPq/G5+z3C6/dH83PiepXSjGWraOx7B Rhe2WYLcH1o7Pf2uhP0Pvlwa5GwNhuQqSVI1jCWDrF6B5lLu/o1MHnsaNE1QUdbh9JUp tbvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688717228; x=1691309228; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ACFyZ5erGqi6On+j4YOrIfu9YLZK6YDxXX5v+hYXvxM=; b=OWXAKaYrYM22Zi9NRfnkdbouZqlzXE39oEutHAiVQeAcuCPKNme7kayd17n8SANG42 G5KIg18yYBCajt1/KwW5hpOjoa+OM+xODXNtShCXRDVJY7HUfnsKjTuzjAys0j11OKMH 6yObcMFqGIAwcLFOugbZisNFPseEKpAXZSq3jek2BgLNptUKaPNj5VNpr24fGyFsUNH0 EPDAXx2TSaVNk1ATS+4/3etJ9qpPfg8nlJK0dTsWf/130BbsIavdP6jRTlwOKd44mL/I LuxLl6mogagf9TkNwq2bp4vMjJCzXZA2LeF2X1L2kl8f1/yUqeSbEcFTTjj1rjkfEG3f yxqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaq96CL26730kbcSiYXv2WWDjAyr7k90ODrFpt0gyHpxovQGgo8 NTiPXvS3SFoAyzLPFcyp9SgUiAWyYyp5kIsveeQ0lyPJfKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEF6IyCbZMBPgjjIEpYm4Fehwu+qmJB51xXhoWcTf3lf8n81NW3iv+b6EHgK8ISrsgwDWHRBVAubS3hL02qPbQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:46a6:b0:1b0:649f:e68a with SMTP id a38-20020a05687046a600b001b0649fe68amr5334232oap.25.1688717228008; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168854542387.36296.13082017864116657962@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAK044Tgsp87kf6PGOcr-MA6UKHnP4wGu20CnJEXZ+yA=7rMgg@mail.gmail.com> <18b4eb50c5024e0a99bacecea8e0c0f3@hs-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <18b4eb50c5024e0a99bacecea8e0c0f3@hs-esslingen.de>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 01:06:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044QQOwj74m=jp-OU5Yc5vMrpDgVxjwe32vPixX1uE5hedA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008066cf05ffe11e2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/VLqgZ-gHUuSbFOEQP54SspIbLpQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggregation draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 08:07:13 -0000
Hi Michael, Yes, the pcap files I've used don't have much v6 traffic, so I only collected 1.4M syn packets for IPv6. But, the most dominant value for MSS is 1440 (more than 60%) So, I think your suggestion makes sense to me. Thank you so much! -- Yoshi On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:41 AM Scharf, Michael < Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote: > Hi Yoshi, > > > > Regarding the MSS: Isn’t the MSS for IPv6 only 1440 byte? > > > > Just as a thought: Instead of encoding an MSS value, 1 bit could be used > to convey “if set to 1, use the maximum MSS for the Ethernet MTU of 1500 > byte”? > > > > Disclaimer: I haven’t thought about the implications on IPv4/IPv6 > translation techniques. But, anyway, the bigger problem may be the > installed base of MSS clamping… > > > > Michael > > > > *From:* tcpm <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Yoshifumi Nishida > *Sent:* Friday, July 7, 2023 8:40 AM > *To:* tcpm@ietf.org Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggregation draft > > > > Hi folks, > > > > During my presentation for syn aggregation draft in the last WG meeting, > some folks suggested using a catalog approach to compress existing options > such as MSS, wscale, etc. > > I am still thinking, but I've put some initial ideas about this approach > in the updated version of the draft. > > > > In a nutshell, the idea is to use entire bits for 'Group 1'. As one group > can carry 6 bits, we use 4 bits for window scale option, 1 bit for > SACK-permit and another 1 bit for MSS. > > As window scale value ranges from 0 to 14, we can accomodate all values in > 4 bits. > > SACK-permit carries 1 bit information, so using 1 bit is enough. > > MSS is a bit tricky as it can carry various values. But, as far as I've > checked 24M syn packets in CAIDA and WIDE's packet captures, over 40% MSS > options in SYN packets carries 1460. > > Hence, the draft uses 1 bit to indicate MSS=1460. > > > > Since I'm still wondering if this format is fine or there might be more > efficient ways, your feedback is highly appreciated. > > If you're interested, please check the updated draft. > > Thank you so much! > > -- > > Yoshi > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:24 AM > Subject: I-D Action: draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-04.txt > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : Aggregated Option for SYN Option Space Extension > Author : Yoshifumi Nishida > Filename : draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-04.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2023-07-05 > > Abstract: > TCP option space is scarce resource as its maximum length is limited > to 40 bytes. This limitation becomes more significant in SYN > segments as all options used in a connection should be exchanged > during SYN negotiations. This document proposes a new SYN option > negotiation scheme that can aggregate multiple TCP options in SYN > segments into a single option so that more options can be negotiate > during 3-way handshake. With its simple design, the approach does > not require fundamental changes in TCP. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-04.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nishida-tcpm-agg-syn-ext-04 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >
- [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggregatio… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… rs.ietf
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Catalog approach for syn option aggreg… Yoshifumi Nishida