Re: [tcpm] Definition of SMSS/RMSS in RFC5681 are inaccurate?!

Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Mon, 26 July 2010 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <hagen@jauu.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005033A681E for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.183, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, PLING_QUERY=1.39, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sf4E4uhX95hy for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geheimer.internetendpunkt.de (alternativer.internetendpunkt.de [88.198.24.89]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1983A6816 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by geheimer.internetendpunkt.de (Postfix, from userid 33) id E7473F44129; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:43:49 +0200 (CEST)
To: Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:43:49 +0200
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
In-Reply-To: <62315AD7-72BE-42A1-AEFB-E706C54BF50A@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <62315AD7-72BE-42A1-AEFB-E706C54BF50A@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-ID: <07e7e311cf5541066605d58353cc4681@localhost>
X-Sender: hagen@jauu.net
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc1
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Definition of SMSS/RMSS in RFC5681 are inaccurate?!
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:43:33 -0000

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:33:26 +0200, Alexander Zimmermann wrote:

> The size does not include the TCP/IP headers and options. This is wrong!
> The options are the TCP/IP headers.

Strange that nobody spotted this. "The options are the TCP/IP headers",
what does this mean? draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-03 should be mentioned instead:

   The MSS value to be sent in an MSS option should be equal to the
   effective MTU minus the fixed IP and TCP headers.


Hagen