Re: [tcpm] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: (with COMMENT)

Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Fri, 18 December 2020 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CFA3A0B54 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:02:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KByMrQ_exmBB for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089EA3A0B5B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id g185so3538086wmf.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:02:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ntQQH2wgBh4aX62S57dR32LK5HKehKVR4dZOiTqNPOY=; b=BTqKDucuBluvAJe/+GMVLxUPkC2HwlIXYQZNHTQST2e+6Wm957uLXSZEgzAv5ou6kP FsIyqxPiTsTEtMordl69BhDkRkJv2UootPDYGsK14bNUGti9FdkHuG2Gn4Vts7qPi4AF sY5OVNEPULJEnIplHU7f4f1QibHD9ismgAaJhX/71FCXH0YD9HDv98+LyB0jvg+AURdv y1ckVyorKKajdM5eWFJcNDU5srceTaKRY/fjOjodZXkx6BAQTXWKshm5GVbgpEqI/D4E mWaO0HP2FlmxpdOn5QtjXUI5VIQ8b0uQvurAYNjsgpEay4qXdf/yjIChrDuAEdnmlvm3 a5cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ntQQH2wgBh4aX62S57dR32LK5HKehKVR4dZOiTqNPOY=; b=OXVIPfH/KDSaCixk9tdXJ5tRQzWTwnsZk19V91VEo/EKlNbNonKpkl1mcxfst8qjlv F1Q1s6hpw8w4zMZwAFimSKN+PlC1u7b3/HJNJiLnggIG/wTljeWGjEbhNblYDNI9yOv/ EcFgYbI7ZMImS2bkNhYPehITbjVexKs5cZrsQCYINesxThiS3ox+9kyrFrU5CZ30fPNz EASXW1snnbCxznigjFn3S0OHW1UWkUHWC38a7uHd2mjX3oIWblRd1X/33nHg1k2fjvh2 Mv0pCQZ33pUWV9ZbErlbiSOnl6YVwW8JHRj8t0dkHstXMQYD2xomiwboyHntsMWDqz1e RrKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dUamPsXqt1ZJ39x/dvrHL/hcabGfuCmkOfFLZFTCy0Dgb90Dp YWiJ0u/9zn7qhgNdR7jarA+2Yto6r36KZFXgRHif0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHtHxlsJO1VIL/ts2sOwcL8uYZ6W1KwXRmN60k5Z/5ASnsq7HLJPHxNBBlbV80Jz8mQEKzemqms5FLqiShPa8=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:804a:: with SMTP id b71mr5323731wmd.21.1608314531197; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:02:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160818055846.21007.18172807717470668998@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160818055846.21007.18172807717470668998@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:01:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=eRkogBw1jcMvX1ywSCmK2mcyXunk-VsgH4DBbeF2y0=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rack@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rack.all@ietf.org, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000524b1505b6c0e825"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/_urfyBPqw-MOs4oxQ8iImPNyz4E>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:02:16 -0000

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:49 PM Barry Leiba via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Just a very small comment:
>
> — Section 1 —
>
>    In this document, these words will appear
>    with that interpretation only when in UPPER CASE.  Lower case uses of
>    these words are not to be interpreted as carrying [RFC2119]
>    significance.
>
> I don’t particularly object to that quoted text, but it’s redundant: the
> (correct) BCP 14 boilerplate before it already says that.  What’s the
> purpose
> of adding this text?  (I’m guessing it’s a remnant: it was there with the
> old
> BCP 14 boilerplate frim 2119, and when you switched to 8174 you didn’t
> remove
> this.)
>
We'll remove this redundant paragraph. Thanks for catching that!