Re: [tcpm] [Lwip] Review ofdraft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04

" Ilpo Järvinen " <ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi> Sun, 17 November 2019 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B121200B1; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.helsinki.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RrEHhiMgSZN0; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from script.cs.helsinki.fi (script.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.11.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4C7120059; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-DKIM: Courier DKIM Filter v0.50+pk-2017-10-25 mail.cs.helsinki.fi Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:08:04 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.helsinki.fi; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; s=dkim20130528; bh=WP3x2UsxOFmA1oz48 qD+STh7GiE6cpugrqDiC9EyFY8=; b=XjJVL2CHGd8z07H+X5kT2pJjLSMZFdPj2 3FhpSw388lHMjtwvULflCs2f2gFw0czCrADgJw1zgtt+BRpgLBZRY80PWZHdxO49 AslVVABBWhX9IGQO7IO6SLLa8EppxS9FnrkOzYCnsDJxbbPzX4Kuudni/nIbu4po 1wMKIpED4E=
Received: from whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi (whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.166.46]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-GCM-SHA384) by mail.cs.helsinki.fi with ESMTPS; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:08:04 +0200 id 00000000005A0040.000000005DD12A14.000063E0
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:08:04 +0200 (EET)
From: "=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?=" <ilpo.jarvinen@cs.helsinki.fi>
X-X-Sender: ijjarvin@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
cc: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk" <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "kojo@cs.helsinki.fi" <kojo@cs.helsinki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <bcd55aa0ed37f81db9b88e07682c1d60.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911171247250.21778@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811071352180.14868@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi> <c9a84f24e05fd1b433cf22fe742857c5.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904261602000.23031@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi> <184404a792aadb06ac772ffe05bc3233.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <bdb83140-4bc1-dd45-1a5e-e5f4e23c638f@ericsson.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908281435330.18955@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi> <bcd55aa0ed37f81db9b88e07682c1d60.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/cXqOSpJ2e7Hz2MtXwJu7t3vEC3M>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Lwip] Review ofdraft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:08:13 -0000

On Sun, 17 Nov 2019, Carles Gomez Montenegro wrote:

> First of all, apologies for this very late reply.
> 
> Once again, thanks a lot for your thorough review!
> 
> We recently published -09. We believe that this last revision addresses
> your remaining points below.
> 
> Should you have further comments, please do not hesitate to let us know.

Thanks. It looks good now.

I was a bit surprised by the return of the "single-MSS" but then found out 
you had a good reason for that.

-- 
 i.