[tcpm] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-13: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 14 February 2023 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D736C1FB5E7; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:10:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, tuexen@fh-muenster.de
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.9.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Message-ID: <167640543218.48168.17118970197116977036@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:10:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/dqQcphEnNp8DPaKSamg-5Ub53EY>
Subject: [tcpm] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:10:32 -0000

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing to add beyond what Lars and John already said, but please do look at
the comment of the Mohit's secdir review:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-12-secdir-lc-sethi-2023-01-22/

    The "Security Considerations" section only contains a pointer to RFC 5681. I
    think this is insufficient. I recommend copying the text from RFC 5681 that
    is applicable while retaining a reference to RFC 5681. For example, it is
    not clear to me if the RECOMMENDATION against ACK division attack stated in
    RFC 5681 is also applicable for HyStart++.