Re: [tcpm] WG adoption of draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 19 September 2014 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E472A1A88BD for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYC6MPHe2MLV for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB8F1A6F34 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.81] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s8JMTjB0001732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <541CAE5B.7010103@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:29:47 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>, "tcpm@ietf.org (tcpm@ietf.org)" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <A78875F5-32C8-4AA1-91BC-D58ED94E662A@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <A78875F5-32C8-4AA1-91BC-D58ED94E662A@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/eXML5H_Faqyz12AtzmqXyPVQ_ac
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG adoption of draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:30:12 -0000

Hi, Pasi, et al.,

AOK - will do.

Joe

On 9/19/2014 5:29 AM, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The Extended Data Offset Option draft (draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo) was
> discussed in the last IETF meeting, and there was a clear consensus in
> favor of adopting the draft as a TCPM working group item. Therefore,
> this mail confirms the adoption of the draft as a working group item.
> 
> Among the co-chairs, and our AD Martin, we discussed the intended
> status for the document. We thought that the draft should be targeted as
> Proposed Standard, even though in the meeting there were also other
> opinions. There does not seem to be any obvious experimentation that the
> document would require, introducing a fairly straight-forward protocol
> mechanism to extend the option space. Middlebox interactions were
> discussed, and that certainly is an operational issue to be found out,
> but not necessarily a reason to make the document experimental. On the
> other hand, we hope that the intended PS status would encourage thorough
> review and implementations. We are not in a hurry to push this document
> for publication, so we should have enough maturation time for this.
> 
> So authors: please submit the next version as
> draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo.
> 
> - Pasi, Michael, Yoshifumi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>