[tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri, 14 February 2014 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFFD1A0301; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQeUFqiv8NzE; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB921A02CC; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:43:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140214164337.10575.13912.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:43:37 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/ixsdgHqVddJsI6Z2MECahO8626I
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:43:40 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Problem Statement and Requirements for a More Accurate ECN Feedback
        Authors         : Mirja Kuehlewind
                          Richard Scheffenegger
                          Bob Briscoe
	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05.txt
	Pages           : 15
	Date            : 2014-02-14

Abstract:
   Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) is an IP/TCP mechanism where
   network nodes can mark IP packets instead of dropping them to
   indicate congestion to the end-points.  An ECN-capable receiver will
   feed this information back to the sender.  ECN is specified for TCP
   in such a way that it can only feed back one congestion signal per
   Round-Trip Time (RTT).  In contrast, ECN for other transport
   protocols, such as RTP/UDP and SCTP, is specified with more accurate
   ECN feedback.  Recent new TCP mechanisms (like ConEx or DCTCP) need
   more accurate ECN feedback in the case where more than one marking is
   received in one RTT.  This document specifies requirements for an
   update to the TCP protocol to provide more accurate ECN feedback.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/