Re: [tcpm] TCP RACK implementation status
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Fri, 09 January 2015 18:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DB71A87E4 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:11:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJczR6vHk4M8 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFFA81A2119 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:11:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z20so2891552igj.4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:11:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cac5sb0ndNHNZbSrIUrWaWCD2VLJpcySctzBzjauW1k=; b=J2AItvl771hW0Di4gPoUoM7LiH+iQOUvY4dWAz0nlf719GuvDYMk74MqiZWGMzQNGu Vb69Lag0CsWXGke37As2pSBKLVEV1WFzp7G1hEH307yt/+k5erR+Ojwii67CVNSfJRw2 ACtI+PC1ZiE7k24UWVC2i8lFNjQyQV1/JS3fZCJbV3s8JI5j667HtWHoQUo/SZ1zldRy qw3Iw1F2XP8YjSN9jmUZZojz1vuabByr4cIkUpOZSl+wwTjo4iw+QjS6UQCYFu9bRJc9 BWd2CI4NxqzbUxBNO1ohdQ4dDi/F9Nu8Rgfnwq0qRYQslggVwESHINl5IQKdGL1VGH34 3Tiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cac5sb0ndNHNZbSrIUrWaWCD2VLJpcySctzBzjauW1k=; b=mbzlTS7OACg7v0iYoKmTaMwKYNdezYBVLVvVHvQrN/1/h/HaBGPqiEcU9q27AvNFxC CoWfzdzw7G9718dTtLBuas2W7fjWvoBCf1mqxLUSJL+ZvjdS9XIqwisnj9BbMqkL+TQh vXTfT64mfP8/JhTkpePa5DLKBxGt08jxKQMCUIK5Qxz9s1HgqAs+nXSAKaqAN/sn/1UE GwKRdyVoYOhgAOqovi93ss/xtltxKe6CJqpFNd2990RTsZf2itBmhApUanN6xmCqOnLt LAhdNG6ynXEB9IGnfSiiJXGI1JXxMHtBxYpmmbqjQMmsYBr3/B4yftBE9ShgVLmM3jmD niOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnItUcQkm0XGLhrmyvBjXV7CTpqYa2zli/HGjuTE+Z2zl3RRlXhqJ5Xp7K+VqVYckRL3E7A
X-Received: by 10.107.12.10 with SMTP id w10mr16482682ioi.71.1420827076820; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:11:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.62.49 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:10:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA32057971@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se>
References: <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA32057971@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:10:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=debCOHv=j5WuGUY4uOgr72YoeRAYpZ54gvEOrO=Cq9bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed6f233d91e050c3c15cd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/oaBwBhSkxyl5gmCwPTo1zEvs7iI>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP RACK implementation status
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:11:19 -0000
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Ingemar Johansson S < ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi > > > > Is TCP RACK implemented in e.g. the latest Linux TCP kernel ?. > > Are there plans to do this or is more research needed ? > It is not in Linux (yet). We are still doing research and testing our implementations on Google servers. > > /Ingemar > > ================================= > > Ingemar Johansson M.Sc. > > Senior Researcher > > > > Ericsson AB > > Wireless Access Networks > > Labratoriegränd 11 > > 971 28, Luleå, Sweden > > Phone +46-1071 43042 > > SMS/MMS +46-73 078 3289 > > ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com > > www.ericsson.com > > > > “The Earth is a very small stage in a > > vast cosmic arena” > Carl Sagan “Pale Blue Dot” > ================================= > > > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > >
- [tcpm] TCP RACK implementation status Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tcpm] TCP RACK implementation status Yuchung Cheng