IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00.txt

Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Sat, 24 October 2015 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2991A1BE6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ExgFbPTEWFJF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951981A1BAC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkgs66 with SMTP id s66so18070510vkg.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0SLTHs0WTsnRtUiFgYPg59ZpN6m4OpS1rHcweYMMRt0=; b=atlFingnY6DW0BRab03V90dmC9JnmZ+pk/wPQJ4BLFpG3wC0NL/hOcvEi1baPciU/v dO9KXE1t1DexAsFeqFWkXWN4DvFb61Sa2YaPMJ+lUs/gLBD6r0C65Zy2BYK9is9gtTDF P61Kxm05tgQdCK0wKTaVT34XCgCIr9jc1+chTbpQOKnMEdXdNUTEFZe0/Z7tfxgSjtlL aXCr4UQCK4b/8dTgV7/BLzui3XnfPHlK/RtLUN9+tJASr/GGesn1/HrkZeqNK8e7g88l RUx8x0I798Ju0uKNEwCLbYeecazEaxR+vEn5hQkUNhOxbO0zvE3DOlBqLf8SfdcfE5bI FLRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0SLTHs0WTsnRtUiFgYPg59ZpN6m4OpS1rHcweYMMRt0=; b=RrsTAyBy6SPc7LYFtmwH/azQIG2ElLZObmO3ogHZJLa7OZ2qlV6OtACAclINA3sp/A L8TpUh7J9c+4sFeGk+l1MIouv93yLTGp9ZU2sK6J5dK08c7dYcI73+7YJUoMH4VaSdeo pLfNP1oMNG2CcZdT+kGl4leMX9L1/sqeYvQNXUTCEbDhBuC++BPzduHKA+IIYy28edwl D6edbBy8Hn6ypIVl4bf4QZpQ/Q3OzMUYpcSaQA6/LvAjMHK9k6E1Z1ER0UaVKqfOxmZc fcvOQvWI1UPxQjDHB2J/T/kfnUBZFNAX4maX9ZysF8bpzCmYfX0a9JscTylJ41+HgZyE 4Vtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDaBXWo1hBZKuh/pRKpDdaZ9BbJOuFUHYPYbILo7YwebCVPlY+3XfN13icx/uO7o3EEzK8
X-Received: by 10.31.41.149 with SMTP id p143mr17492518vkp.4.1445702876662; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.153.134 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151019201145.14841.30865.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151019201145.14841.30865.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:07:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=dZGRLkF3M9v3XTP6WQUVbG6OESerwecWfN43WLGOuJTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/pq_VVzqS6PzpDHbVW-QrS5k62Cc>
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 16:07:59 -0000

Hi folks,

We finally put up a draft for RACK, a new loss detection.

RACK has been deployed at Google for well over a year in both TCP and
QUIC. The patches are also available for upstream Linux
(https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg83215.html) .
In the next -01 draft, we plan to further combine RACK with TLP (Tail
Loss Probe) because both work together well and TLP will no longer
require FACK.

Comments are welcome.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:11 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00.txt
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yuchung Cheng and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-cheng-tcpm-rack
Revision:       00
Title:          RACK: a time-based fast loss detection algorithm for TCP
Document date:  2015-10-19
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          12
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-tcpm-rack/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-tcpm-rack-00


Abstract:
   This document presents a new TCP loss detection algorithm called RACK
   ("Recent ACKnowledgment").  RACK uses the notion of time, instead of
   packet or sequence counts, to detect losses, for modern TCP
   implementations that can support per-packet timestamps and the
   selective acknowledgment (SACK) option.  It is intended to replace
   the conventional DUPACK threshold approach and its variants, as well
   as other nonstandard approaches.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email