[tcpm] sequence number validation?
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 13:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092911A089A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuqhjjDUuk0t for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877141A089B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.211]) by atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7CD5hoU021023 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:05:43 -0400
Received: (qmail 17402 invoked by uid 0); 12 Aug 2014 13:05:43 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 69.81.143.143
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.108?) (wes@mti-systems.com@69.81.143.143) by 0 with ESMTPA; 12 Aug 2014 13:05:43 -0000
Message-ID: <53EA111D.9040106@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:05:33 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/q8nv5qDR6_7jz0Q08M666jTpMY8
Subject: [tcpm] sequence number validation?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:05:54 -0000
I'm curious about the working group status of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-seq-validation-01 It seems quite obvious to me that it should be adopted. Since this should be fairly quick to take care of, and is one of the open issues with RFC 793, I'd like to see it adopted, finished off relatively quickly, and then incorporated into the 793bis work. To that end, I'll happily contribute reviews or any other support needed. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- [tcpm] sequence number validation? Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcpm] sequence number validation? Yoshifumi Nishida