[tcpm] WG status on July 25, 2011
"SCHARF, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 25 July 2011 21:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B969C21F84E7 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3YsXV5Jx-YxT for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de (mailrelay2.alcatel.de [194.113.59.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0C721F84DF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de (slfsn1.rcs.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.60.98]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id p6PLJcGw031207 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:19:38 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:19:36 +0200
Message-ID: <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C0654BA90@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WG status on July 25, 2011
Thread-Index: AcxLEI5Eo4yaufXOT/m6eIv+U3i+QA==
From: "SCHARF, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 149.204.45.73
Subject: [tcpm] WG status on July 25, 2011
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:19:40 -0000
Hello, below is a snapshot of TCPM status from the chairs prior to the IETF 81 meeting. As usual, we may have made mistakes, so please correct us, if needed. We have an ongoing WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc3782-bis, which hasn't triggered any feedback so far. Please have a look at that draft. Please also note that the authors of draft-mathis-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction and draft-touch-tcpm-automatic-iw ask for WG adaption. The chairs plan to ask for feedback on that in tomorrow's meeting. Thanks! Michael and David (TCPM co-chairs) Recent RFCs =========== RFC 6093 - On the Implementation of the TCP Urgent Mechanism (January 2011) RFC 6191 - Reducing the TIME-WAIT State Using TCP Timestamps (April 2011) RFC 6247 - Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1379, RFC1644 and RFC1693 to Historic Status (May 2011) RFC 6298 - Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer (June 2011) WG Items Nearing RFC Publication ================================ Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition draft-ietf-tcpm-persist Milestone Target: Informational Status: Revised ID needed after IESG evaluation WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC ============================================ MSS Option draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Action with David Borman 1948bis draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard until September 2011 Status: WGLC completed Action: Next step is PROTO writeup The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc3782-bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2011 Status: Ongoing WGLC Action: WGLC until August 5, 2011 Active WG Items =============== 1323bis draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Needs revision Action: Revise & WGLC (action with David Borman) TCP Security draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010 Status: Content needs work, draft expired Action: Action with author to address review comments SACK Entry / RFC 3517bis draft-blanton-tcpm-3517bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 Status: Probably ready for WGLC Action: WGLC soon? Increasing the Initial Window draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd Milestone Target: August 2011 to determine intended status September 2011 to publish document Status: Under active discussion / review Action: Determine intended status Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items ========================================= Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP draft-mathis-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction Status: Presented at IETF 80, discussion on the list Action: WG adoption? Automating the Initial Window in TCP draft-touch-tcpm-automatic-iw Status: Discussion on the list Action: WG adoption? Active Internet-Drafts ====================== draft-allman-tcpm-rto-consider draft-cheng-tcpm-fastopen draft-fairhurst-tcpm-newcwv draft-nishida-tcpm-rescue-retransmission draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation draft-yourtchenko-tcp-loic (+ many expired Internet-Drafts)
- [tcpm] WG status on July 25, 2011 SCHARF, Michael