Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04.txt
Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 02:24 UTC
Return-Path: <hkchu@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB40921F85D0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFj8dY71t32x for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA6E21F85E5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgo11 with SMTP id go11so4239095lbb.31 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; bh=klrPjaip7CCLTSPBqyyd7RUN3LIa+TzaiMB/P6dpnGk=; b=GR06NaRbAzcbdQhQ/NA1TGomm0bwPRV7pjNvPjTl9xAHuzURSWn5Ua75Oyg6eKEmjr hiPYbNH1osp/anvKpDQqZ3eKjYUWhaTWg2DTWdRTP6S3T0YVDQITR07cbVdCTuR8m7zp fCw4GSsFJ1yubRbIk+z71t3/BnbFniAL9K7pyoefFAX8iUeBk/z71JLP7tzpDRmCd/gd z8SwQbS08AlH876LWYI/u0nR4fh5Ze/CgH72Rs8d6gAeF8m8eV1FQER5DZIECo9mlSJ2 E1Z3lybqpLKvnXcSyn1e0cd5x6go+ai3UIKw8buhVweBmgwNjwzUuppV4l/2vQLHTcoj iHQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=klrPjaip7CCLTSPBqyyd7RUN3LIa+TzaiMB/P6dpnGk=; b=HXP3kr33g6JjBkS3Tp9RCO98ai+JGScX35fvZ/VeTMKcqgDSVrgtDNDVUDDs7bxjll dnf/p1k875LYtiZckkDu85dtGFRkxwAJxcHxKDWm+Qluz9g75AfovaG+pPtfUz52anDP gnhKDWmK8o4OAwR9mlyDJc16x856xk3O92ZRDwHOIhaciEh1ggL46z6I7sj9fBtMeq/2 EOLFSAuwKcWFOjXDGGY7ncQxm6nPmVVpWwQ9/8cApQZCUYOOaAJsFlD7yFMlVK/MrI5V Dk+qi3vNjNfN5gZjspWOO+TIyy77GjRBruuTEykNq/smGR6URn5nSi6gNHk1OHsem0FF RSnw==
Received: by 10.152.131.37 with SMTP id oj5mr1522117lab.14.1340936646667; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.131.37 with SMTP id oj5mr1522102lab.14.1340936646468; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.6.1 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120629021430.6265.41739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120629021430.6265.41739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:24:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPshTCg0OY3xqU4+RL=Khp-n0DAGr3tWbp2c8pFcfsoCk7oqUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXGQhN6eBjj2oPp9ZF5vODx0mZV9r5YvQUffxtTh/ZwyjxhwhZ9yo+G25BvUIhJGmKhV9n40Zmp+iisaYwY9Y50N46eAcrQ3/GXNMYQfetefdf+ytrjTt0GxjzlS3tqJtEqLx2ucYcDgUlo0h2pJFk9TyKaWd9v6j7MHQTQdCTp4VeF+w=
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:24:09 -0000
Draft revision for WGLC - changes are concentrated in Abstract, Section 1 Introduction, Section 7 Disadvantages of Larger Initial Windows for the Network, and Section 12 Usage and Deployment Recommendations. Jerry On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:14 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Increasing TCP's Initial Window > Author(s) : Jerry Chu > Nandita Dukkipati > Yuchung Cheng > Matt Mathis > Filename : draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04.txt > Pages : 24 > Date : 2012-06-28 > > Abstract: > This document proposes an experiment to increase the permitted TCP > initial window (IW) from between 2 and 4 segments, as specified in > RFC 3390, to 10 segments, with a fallback to the existing > recommendation when performance issues are detected. It discusses the > motivation behind the increase, the advantages and disadvantages of > the higher initial window, and presents results from several large > scale experiments showing that the higher initial window improves the > overall performance of many web services without resulting in a > congestion collapse. The document closes with a discussion of usage > and deployment for further experimental purpose recommended by the > IETF TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) working group. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04 > > A diff from previous version is available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-04.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-0… Jerry Chu