[tcpm] whether draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure "updates" RFC793
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 09 October 2009 12:50 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6617E3A6A77; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqa-Yyd-gTpE; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07043A6A5F; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.180.41.18] ([192.100.124.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n99CqPS0056323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:52:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-60--239855342"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:52:15 +0300
Message-Id: <60363DD5-FAF8-4BD5-A74B-11C8A01B448C@nokia.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org WG" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.194]); Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:52:26 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] whether draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure "updates" RFC793
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:50:53 -0000
Hi, since the TCPM WG has asked the IESG to determine whether in our understanding draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure "updates" RFC793, the IESG decided on the telechat yesterday that in our understanding, it does not. However, the IESG also acknowledges that there are different interpretations of what the "updates" relationship between documents actually means. The IESG has taken on a work item to document its understanding of this relationship, either through an IESG Statement or maybe through an RFC. Lars