IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] TCP Connection ID

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149603A0F58 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.082
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.082 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MoflJwbXxNJw for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1EE3A0F55 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rI3JMmSJByHX8dLuRNFvLlnzz+wI90jU/OpIMiDu38I=; b=4toISfSbKFaYjpe5I4CKeOYYM Hno5gwDiHF4bmLbN6ufYqpqxTudG6hDgIMffMIwpkFJeEAXdMWv0l5s2In7f9xfL8DEnHKSP+1tmf qtmuWQ0e5rAWDkpogg/c9zvuucG6Xs85bX6AB446AqsJ63yVkg2ZMRQaXdv6Py73v1C0I19Rbti1v StZQGU2qn+2yqcP/wzQCVYR/I48dBOKZLEn8ay83H+8Un/CMic2BI6k424ovey7euHtg8qi/PgibF nuI+mU+p/u0p7f2jBvMq/7x/rnQWqxVXxM3AmQ/ThlcLoKupF1cwy4xJCkV/1GM7ahMY1i+c8IijE 5WlnifMZA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:53701 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1jdzh2-002dFR-1z; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:20 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F14C23DA-A79F-4E46-A63B-B086002E9A34"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJuVx18w3j6tpWfeHMNYVnF3R2N5Wt=23jBAjJG+5fF8NJX27Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 10:18:15 -0700
Cc: Alexander Azimov <a.e.azimov@gmail.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <9FF84BB4-6AA8-4C37-8B51-D4B87228FCF6@strayalpha.com>
References: <CAEGSd=DQwj_XbpxCz=7GYTgzjGM=ARqgw3oG58_Y9hbNZpPPrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEGSd=BrgqFrZVexkKhvYr2Yeu-B2Gyde7aYevPqTr8MzWQs4A@mail.gmail.com> <86F47ECD-8504-4FAA-8D39-0099C203FA0C@tessares.net> <CAEGSd=Adh2-JNZDp6CksDUbV59jZ5nZkup8gvahjzs=T8BNsmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJuVx18w3j6tpWfeHMNYVnF3R2N5Wt=23jBAjJG+5fF8NJX27Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@tessares.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/u58eJJ1q8qJou6Q4Wi5Y5atLrxw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP Connection ID
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:22 -0000


> On May 25, 2020, at 11:51 PM, Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@tessares.net> wrote:
> 
> Another possibility would be to place the connection id in the network
> layer, see doi:10.1109/TNET.2018.2799242

Not unless the network layer is establishing the connection, IMO.

In IP, connections are transport layer and above; they shouldn’t be buried elsewhere. (And no, a flow ID is not a connection ID, because one flow may represent multiple connections or one connection may use multiple flows).

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email