[tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt]
Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Thu, 26 March 2020 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBACE3A0BE7 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 06:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8PIn36z_z73 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 06:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A555D3A0CCA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 06:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 02QDmc9o019143; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:48:39 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B9A1D53C1; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:48:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 83.53.67.51 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <a6c336c86175e01cf7291a38f7ca83e1.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:48:38 +0100
From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Cc: jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:48:39 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/uCEGxG16UrsKz7OtviRz5kZ2Z5c>
Subject: [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:48:58 -0000
Dear all, We just submitted an updated version of our draft, which is now entitled "Sender Control of Delayed Acknowledgments in TCP: Problem Statement, Requirements and Analysis of Potential Solutions". In this revision (-01), most of the updates are intended to address the comments by Bob Briscoe on -00. Comments are welcome! Thanks, Carles and Jon ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Date: Thu, March 26, 2020 2:31 pm To: "Carles Gomez" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> "Jon Crowcroft" <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- A new version of I-D, draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Carles Gomez and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs Revision: 01 Title: Sender Control of Delayed Acknowledgments in TCP: Problem Statement, Requirements and Analysis of Potential Solutions Document date: 2020-03-26 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 13 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gomez-tcpm-delack-suppr-reqs-01 Abstract: TCP Delayed Acknowledgments (ACKs) allow reducing protocol overhead in many scenarios. However, in some cases, Delayed ACKs may significantly degrade network and device performance in terms of link utilization, latency, memory usage and/or energy consumption. This document presents the problem statement regarding sender control of Delayed ACKs in TCP. The document discusses the scenarios and use cases in which sender control of Delayed ACKs offers advantages. Then, requirements for a potential solution are derived. Finally, a number of potential solutions are discussed, based on the requirements, and also considering pros and cons in each case. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-g… Carles Gomez Montenegro