IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (7899)

tuexen@fh-muenster.de Wed, 17 April 2024 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989FCC14F5E4; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BySqXSwLslHL; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCAEC14F697; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:e8b1:690b:6a69:a05c]) (Authenticated sender: micmac) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 715C3721E280D; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:27:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92BCCB90-A412-4B92-8812-AB811E9CFCAA"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
In-Reply-To: <20240417151332.5152018EF214@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:27:39 +0200
Cc: touch@isi.edu, mankin@psg.com, rbonica@juniper.net, tcpm-ads@ietf.org, nsd.ietf@gmail.com, ianswett@google.com, jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com, tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8B8FA176-B23F-4785-B005-FEFDD7EC4EBB@fh-muenster.de>
References: <20240417151332.5152018EF214@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/wauBdtHFEqtltJUxTo7kdF8msIU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (7899)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:27:51 -0000

> On 17. Apr 2024, at 17:13, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5925,
> "The TCP Authentication Option".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7899
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jean-Michel COMBES <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 5.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   o  Receive_SYN_traffic_key - the traffic key used to authenticate
>      incoming SYNs.  The source ISN is known (the TCP connection's
>      remote ISN), and the destination (remote) ISN is unknown (and so
>      the value 0 is used).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   o  Receive_SYN_traffic_key - the traffic key used to authenticate
>      incoming SYNs.  The source ISN is known (the TCP connection's
>      remote ISN), and the destination (local) ISN is unknown (and so
>      the value 0 is used).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> "remote side" is referenced twice: cut-and-paste error, IMHO, from the previous paragraph
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5925 (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The TCP Authentication Option
> Publication Date    : June 2010
> Author(s)           : J. Touch, A. Mankin, R. Bonica
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
I think the reporter is correct.

Best regards
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email