IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] 793bis: purpose of RST w/ data

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 06 January 2022 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0C83A0B02 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 23:49:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXHPsGT3VGYZ for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 23:49:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EBD3A0B01 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 23:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a436.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JTz5C6LxdzDCc6; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 08:49:19 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20133_1641454145_61D69A41_20133_410_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303546EB13@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 08:49:19 +0100
Cc: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, "ek.ietf@gmail.com" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 663148159.477033-cbb242d31a48e64b757b744e3c7052b4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6EEE12D7-53EE-4BA4-B06D-38CBCCC34215@tzi.org>
References: <072d9785-0ff3-f6c2-1ead-f695ec7d80e0@mti-systems.com> <20133_1641454145_61D69A41_20133_410_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303546EB13@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/wwRRnuq2UVDhNmUzyRn8ctwxapw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] 793bis: purpose of RST w/ data
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:49:31 -0000

We call it “diagnostic payload” in RFC 7252.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7252#section-5.5.2

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2022-01-06, at 08:29, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> It makes sense to include the example but without the “ASCII text” thing.  
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email