[tcpm] initiating WGLC for draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Fri, 20 August 2010 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417E43A67E2 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.495, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bvuLRl84vEP3 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6383A6838 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.102]) by ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DCF261245 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:41:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub02-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.161]) by ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7K1fVbO007969 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:41:31 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub02.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.161]) with mapi; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:41:31 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:41:31 -0500
Thread-Topic: initiating WGLC for draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize
Thread-Index: AQHLQAjQWCMkn2RB+kSu1V5POWQ5cg==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4818A49B65@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011, 1.0.148, 0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-19_11:2010-08-19, 2010-08-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] initiating WGLC for draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 01:40:58 -0000

Following up on the earlier thread to adopt draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize as a TCPM working group item, there seems to be positive support and no objection to the document itself, though there was a lot of discussion on the alternate checksum option going forward.

Based on the nature of this document (not a technical spec, just cleaning up the status of other documents), the authors and chairs think we can just do a one-month working group last call in order to complete this activity.

The document can be found at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00

Please review it, and send your comments, concerns, and critiques to the TCPM list by September 17.  If this is too soon, and you think more time is warranted, this would be a fair comment to raise as well.

Thanks in advance.