spoofing (third party ack generation) ?

"kim yong sin" <dragon@dcn.soongsil.ac.kr> Sat, 19 September 1998 01:19 UTC

X-Authentication-Warning: assateague.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-ID: <000d01bde36c$dc230e60$4d03fdcb@soongsil.ac.kr>
From: kim yong sin <dragon@dcn.soongsil.ac.kr>
To: tcppep <tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov>
Subject: spoofing (third party ack generation) ?
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 10:19:14 +0900
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0518.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0518.4
Sender: owner-tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 301
Lines: 14

I have a question about spoofing behavior (in Base Station)
when spoofing buffer overflow.

1. no cache, drop packet, no spoofing ack
2. no cache, drop packet, send dup. ack to sender
3. no cache, transmit data packet to destination, no spoofing ack

which is right?
what is happen after?

Thanks.

spoofing (third party ack generation) ? kim yong sin