Re: Pushing more than 936kb/sec via satellite
Brad Smith <brads@internetsat.com> Sun, 15 November 1998 16:24 UTC
X-Authentication-Warning: assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-ID: <364F002F.31DA@internetsat.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 11:24:15 -0500
From: Brad Smith <brads@internetsat.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
CC: tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: Pushing more than 936kb/sec via satellite
References: <2.2.32.19981115143027.006bdb48@max.ibm.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2037
Lines: 50
Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > I have read over: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpsat-stand-mech-06.txt > and have some questions. I am not on your list, so please remember to reply > also directly to me. > > Today, is there any way without modifying the TCP stacks in NT, W95, AIX, > Solaris, SG, HP, etc. to push more than 936kb/sec via satellite? Not that I'm aware of, operationally. YMMV. > Can one > put a black box on each end and fake things out (window size, ACKs, NAKs, > etc.) for all TCP streams so as to get 20-30Mb/sec per TCP stream via GEO > satellites? Does anyone know anyone doing this? Theoretically, yes. Personally, I've been playing with an extremely rudimentary system that consists of two BSD boxes (one at either end of the GEO link) that essentially function as circuit level relays. On the BSD ---- BSD GEO link, timing mechanisms are disabled, and the window is propped open to something obscene (2GB). Works OK, but there are problems with it. I'm quite sure a better programmer could do a better job. Of course, I don't have 30Mb/s of xpndr space to play with, but my test data says it should scale. > Does anyone know of > equipment that can handle T3/OC-3 speeds? For DS-3 I'd look at the Raydine DM-45. EFData's SDM-155 should do the trick for OC-3. I have no personal experience with either of these devices so again, YMMV. Of course, there's always the DVB route. I'm just not partial to the idea of running all my IP traffic through a DVB head end system. Particularily when that head end system runs Windows NT. > > What if the GEO satellite link was simplex with a fiber uplink? This would > alter the numbers - has anyone had any experience with hybrid systems being > able to pump 20-40Mb/sec per single TCP stream? > My customers configured in this manner generally get about 15 - 20% better performance. Again, I don't have the xpndr capacity to tell you anything about a 20 - 40 Mb/s stream, but the 4 and 8 Mb/s customers are pretty happy. --brad
- Pushing more than 936kb/sec via satellite Hank Nussbacher
- Re: Pushing more than 936kb/sec via satellite Brad Smith
- Re: Pushing more than 936kb/sec via satellite Anil Agarwal