[teas-3272bis-design-team] congestion related abbreviations
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 28 February 2020 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD7D3A1394 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1U7R7KekBOdD for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5E93A1392 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [119.94.165.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6693636475C for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:08:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org" <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <0b8ed1eb-ec6f-6df9-dcc1-24d24a66249b@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:08:02 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-3272bis-design-team/P1TvQKh0-6i42XDZBf2wCm63CSU>
Subject: [teas-3272bis-design-team] congestion related abbreviations
X-BeenThere: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <teas-3272bis-design-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-3272bis-design-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:08:11 -0000
Folks, In 3272 we have a paragraph that says: The schemes described in the short time scale (e.g., RED and its variations, ECN, LQD, and RND) RED is Random Early Detection ECN is Explicit Congestion Notificastion I've been searching for LQD and RND, but can't find anything, someone thjat know? /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [teas-3272bis-design-team] congestion related abb… Loa Andersson