IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] DRAFT slides for 3272bis update

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 21 April 2020 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D72B3A0A49; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJlS8WiKRcN0; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C1E3A0A4F; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03LKkLuL020097; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:46:21 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E4722044; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:46:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F2122042; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:46:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (81-174-202-163.bbplus.pte-ag2.dyn.plus.net [81.174.202.163] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03LKkKkH011405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:46:20 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org
References: <005101d617fe$044410f0$0ccc32d0$@olddog.co.uk> <a49ef2da-d1ad-d3a8-a74b-a262df3d5712@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <a49ef2da-d1ad-d3a8-a74b-a262df3d5712@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:46:20 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <009601d6181d$e9a967c0$bcfc3740$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGcP6cAKiydC2LjbRoP4U4uA8ap1gGkYVo8qOqYomA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.202.163
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25370.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.405-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.405-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25370.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--1.405300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: lORh06tOiKgeimh1YYHcKHFPUrVDm6jtC/ExpXrHizyCFz9ikiaZRvJu ryuigo6Qecpju2Kzy4Qnn27f1ryqpo3snRxZwOJ5sgYw1+LBrk19LQinZ4QefOL622/gm5vp3n8 eBZjGmUzkwjHXXC/4I7I7zVffJqTz+ZdPLC7lqoYV/LPGc3ycL/XarlsJ5xqSuqAwNOwhJWY2w7 o5EIP+C6XU79a9DSYsj00kU/KsUFEuDgHqaPqiZwXm+8Gfspyz
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-3272bis-design-team/q8LsnJLd4MsjCTpov_BaFVMVbmM>
Subject: Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] DRAFT slides for 3272bis update
X-BeenThere: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <teas-3272bis-design-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-3272bis-design-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:46:29 -0000

> WRT the what's next slide - why not just say ready for 
> adoption?

It's like I care or something?

Not sure it will make much of an impact on the work on the draft. So it is
mainly about process (you) and whether having it as a WG draft would be
useful (you, as well).

A

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email