Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange

Nabil Bitar <nbitar40@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nbitar40@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1BD1A7034 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:06:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXZ_ZFDR4Cg8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 541BE1A702E for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m82so71419400oif.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:06:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=tptZbgAzi3GlBGkJpMnOU70Sg1pZfq3xpplO1UJOAYA=; b=Yu8FyeR7AU9PdNSzkXwq8Gu/ARTHvCEncP4tyb0mwjmNegcSCWEjnMLK8DReN7KM4f nlY9WnOuzC9HJ8zlsyQU1+TyBSUlOzrJSn0t9Nmo5j8LPdk2GQVVoBJT33a2SEQXo8qA y5jzWRK2Ut23mSHINNkdyi+Tc/Oj5ld9UTLqtQHcxY6ZWpYFDQbxfuTqxqK8jO/z/rDy oNGQLRwNxgJr72p7TeB+nzTI+iQ53cdaqU+0mTK6y7X3D6zmppUMU4bhLosfKUGxDDUt tf5DVs2v2hfx9VQ20mQjF1Bn681+05zOAGpOluSRqssQBL+WJUa5t2HrGiFgg14i92Gq wdCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=tptZbgAzi3GlBGkJpMnOU70Sg1pZfq3xpplO1UJOAYA=; b=V4gb66wsoRWMpHpAtglFDwrsa91N8cgUYGzshJSkCbLmCLn+zRrXSqzf1nyt+4t1ij Aa8/wdtKi5PjqWyxC+E6RCm585WApvkXOq7zava3cstLcW4AxWpnMrfPsieiRV5vhNRB RPyMxEy6t6vFifhfKoMouYbROLR2daNRA0eNyk2ws+WRJgOwNFhNuuRYnPHr6AXoIAzp 5AQOcmYALR/RN5K3/xEvaJEmAFzcgr4XLGpVJs51Zw5i03MKDKfR2OxWN32/E3aDnOn6 z5OMANPurPTgmr1HXpLO6wTps4MvlP1+GJ5HLDLhrMv4cEedhG2XKBnzi74glNdk2sLQ eqpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLjsMxnCgUHvd9lyCGD//7iUbYnJpAm2eRgGc9CzUsKVzWZBFXNl4AENBuftNab2JChlbgVMVROxVkwjA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.78.138 with SMTP id c132mr5985113oib.103.1457319965659; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.69.212 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:06:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CALJS60TksHzaASmERPjtvyu+HfvgsCdx4qR+Wp=3aGaQf=VLEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nabil Bitar <nbitar40@gmail.com>
To: teas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c162a0e09b11052d6cbe26"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/-GyvzQh4zXYMgXcQnsrkdvDXC9E>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 03:06:08 -0000

I saw an IPR disclosure submitted to the IETF by Infinera that
pertains to this draft. I have not yet looked into how this disclosure
applies to the draft.


Otherwise,

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,

Nabil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 7:48 AM
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; John E Drake;
> nabil.bitar@verizon.com; swallow@cisco.com;
> cyril.margaria@googlemail.com; diego.caviglia@ericsson.com; Gert Grammel;
> jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com; kpithewan@infinera.com; ogondio@tid.es;
> rrao@infinera.com; sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com; Vishnu Pavan
> Beeram; vlopez@tid.es; zali@cisco.com; zhang.xian@huawei.com;
> zhangfatai@huawei.com
> Cc: TEAS WG; TEAS WG Chairs
> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage
> until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an
> author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR
> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
>