IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E23132018; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZgcwWeWFLyB; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x241.google.com (mail-yw0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F94131FFB; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x241.google.com with SMTP id t139so877461ywg.1; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=huwtT/xK7Mnvdy4TzpIkG5OF3xbJuANNii0MJ5G/7xw=; b=H1/beT0bX/LpaMt5OwtkUTHXo9u/Gp6af6pdvVPjCgSa9dNmRpYTQMVmBHsE0vbX/b YEp43A5hZvenLYCy1mtZsOt2mM4lTUrjtqF1aXsp/wDt4Dp9YA/HTJ/9EUUErux+pxp9 wxGi5Edr3bWsQOEVo/XYJ4C1b9stA10F51k3QH/2nJ337yyJwMNpZ5LfIpviD9B/Qg00 b4b7mlXD5Bisgm+1YxDIp0Rx0gZQLcIzOXkdRYR3zzHczKqWsi7kdkSixUQlfwW/QMyv bPiFByFjlgtHKm2NMTjCEsc+YVOjD0AVj2NK8uyK3/asU4LzozahhTb7grqf4eKUlnEY MHFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=huwtT/xK7Mnvdy4TzpIkG5OF3xbJuANNii0MJ5G/7xw=; b=bJzhpBymEBjSTriodV77KgfKnO6Gt5umhH/lnmFyXIx8px2K5hHXCvZ9hrNVVo1aqw dqkMmK2iIYCDaoccZWBFHPd3Z3xtxpyBD6Bg+fTFpD+Gw759kmi8uCeiiK26I1dY9yXz jFDdZqj42awFYOTYU4Glnhu3UD/tWwiUOfafzmRRZ3vN9XNNHQObmnEB1g+f3P6L/8QV xwHjVQQFvzpn+m1nhtm/6rP1LGn449ZshaAzSH+aS+AWqwXQn9eexT4wlCvGggqwJJcn ed/la939HRCdBovqcGsTzXyVuNFLFYbGVydufl3k5GcDx5uPYcV+8Oe2BmyITL0SNvE6 WLSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1103gXx7z6I49SqxeDj6kZK9oMsoNMG8jetVCD/R1a9fjuxnxN+e YKLFpR2yvm+DOw==
X-Received: by 10.13.197.71 with SMTP id h68mr1377083ywd.46.1501769143696; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p127sm13135001ywf.46.2017.08.03.07.05.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM2PR07MB09940F2B84D45E0F2FD28579F0B10@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:05:41 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi@ietf.org>, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04827492-DD41-4DBF-99B2-D0A0BF801CC2@gmail.com>
References: <150171551836.5679.14360895881912372876.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM2PR07MB0994DF2DFD400C4217711E0EF0B10@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM2PR07MB09940F2B84D45E0F2FD28579F0B10@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/1rNsuBSdURC6O2CTIYp-S34688Y>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:05:47 -0000

Hi Daniele,

> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> The GMPLS SCSI is a sub-TLV of the ISCD (interface switching capability descriptor-RFC4203), which in turn is a sub TLV of the Link TLV (RFC3630) ... yes we like nesting in GMPLS šŸ˜Š
> 
> RFC 3630 (section 2.4.2.) says: " Unrecognized sub-TLVs are ignored."
> 
> It seems obvious but it took me a while to go back to the root of the problem, hence few words  would help the reader. How about something along the lines of:
> 
> "Malformed packets should be treated accordingly with error handling procedures defined in RFC3630.ā€ ?

ā€¦

> 
> Re-reading the draft it seems it's already covered by this statement:
> 
> "Size and other formatting restrictions may be imposed by the routing
>        protocol ISCD field, refer to <xref target="RFC4203"/> and <xref
>        target="RFC5307"/>."
> 
> Would you like it to be made more explicit?

Yes. Please. I personally think ignoring a length error as an unrecognized TLV and moving on is not preferable, but I am happy to step aside if that decision is explicitly made.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email