Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-busi-teas-te-types-update-02

Hi Rakesh, TEAS WG,

In an old version of the draft we had the diff in the main body (and the whole YANG model in an appendix)

Based on the feedbacks and suggestions at IETF 113, we have moved the YANG model in the main body and removed the diff

I agree with you that adding the diffs in an appendix to be removed before publication would facilitate the review of the few changes proposed in this I-D

If there are no objections from the WG, I think we can add this appendix right after WG adoption (in the -01 WG version)

Italo

From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: lunedì 20 giugno 2022 15:23
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-busi-teas-te-types-update-02

Hi Lou, WG,

Yes, support the WG adoption of the draft (as a co-author).

I wonder if the draft can include the diffs in the Appendix for a "quick review" given the delta compared to the RFC 8776 is small.
The Appendix can also mention “this section is to be removed before the publication”, and make it clear that the Appendix is only for a "quick review".

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:53 AM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Hello,

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-busi-teas-te-types-update/

No IPR has been disclosed on this document

Please voice your support or objections to adoption on the list by the
end of the day (any time zone) July 1.

Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas