IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834FC1A8974 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0oYkwN8E9db for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BE01A88ED for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2910; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456843290; x=1458052890; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sg+YpqT15TGhYEBgry0gtIkQcRSty0O8YT4XUTeeCbI=; b=JXKAa+j+crlRW2gwEOs37QjuKj6QIa9M98yexAAa74a45+1vB7QYnG8J WjhqLwO3PHhWcgqpKeDT2+iC+NLxY1Ld4nl1Nx6N8wQNDfntmMqfVcvi4 1qYpC6w9R4eu/1uzjJ5B4ZY2MaHkeOFw5iN5aq/2eGZ5xxvYgaNnCkINa s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJAgCbqdVW/4oNJK1egzpSbQa6LAENgWYhhXICgUQ4FAEBAQEBAQFkJ4RBAQEBBHQFDAQCAQgRBAEBKAcyFAcBAQUDAgQOBQiIAgMSDr9aAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFYYShDqCOoFLEQGEWAWNY4krAYVYiAKBZ0uDeYhSjksBHgEBQoNkagGHDjQBfQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,523,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="244096692"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Mar 2016 14:41:30 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u21EfTnR012335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:41:29 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:41:29 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:41:29 -0600
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
Thread-Index: AQHRWDfeBNOGxjTCpUiD7m+0EwXslZ84qaOAgAY2WuCABKrhYIABWvEA///6k0A=
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:41:29 +0000
Message-ID: <e17034e2eceb472887fbb4db3e7fe7c0@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <56A76AFF.4070900@labn.net> <3b8e5eb7af4740ae8b563d6264db869f@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <c88a50d48be2468d8963c4ac0fa5248f@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <d771c922fa504ae09f16070b54c6a11e@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <D2FB18B8.12E27%ggrammel@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D2FB18B8.12E27%ggrammel@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/5svFZnYvvVeTtPih7PT_y5-P0FM>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:41:32 -0000

Forwarding to the list

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Grammel [mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 4:01 AM
To: Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>; nabil.bitar@verizon.com; diego.caviglia@ericsson.com
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange


"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft²


Gert


On 2016-29-02 19:19, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> wrote:

>Nabil, Diego, Gert,
>
>We're just waiting for you guys on this. Please could you reply to the 
>IPR poll on the list?
>
>Cheers
>
>Matt
>
>> Guys,
>> 
>> Second reminder :)
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> > All,
>> >
>> > A gentle reminder... please respond to this IPR poll on the WG list!
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > > Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> > >
>> > > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>> > >
>> > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>> > >
>> > > Please state either:
>> > >
>> > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> > > or
>> > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> > >
>> > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
>> > > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>> > >
>> > > If yes to the above, please state either:
>> > >
>> > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> > > or
>> > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> > >
>> > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>> > > appropriate.
>> > >
>> > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please 
>> > > answer the above by responding to this email regardless of 
>> > > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document 
>> > > will not advance to the next stage until a response has been 
>> > > received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS 
>> > > APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>> > >
>> > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>> > > listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your 
>> > > obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to 
>> > > notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF 
>> > > contribution, or to refrain from participating in any 
>> > > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For 
>> > > more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
>> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> > >
>> > > Thank you,
>> > > TEAS WG Chairs
>> > >
>> > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in 
>> > > your response.
>> > >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email