Re: [Teas] The TEAS WG has placed draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network-slice-application in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

["Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mohamed,

Thanks very much for reviewing the document and giving detailed comments.
The authors are still working together on modifying the document. I think lots of your concerns may be solved in the next version, including the logical connection among different parts and moving some detailed specification to annex. Other comments you have given in the document will also be carefully considered. 
Hopefully there will be an updated version very soon.

Best
Xuesong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 10:11 PM
> To: [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: JACQUENET Christian INNOV/NET <[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: [Teas] The TEAS WG has placed
> draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network-slice-application in state "Candidate for WG
> Adoption"
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks to the authors for the effort put into this document.
> 
> Please find below some quick comments about this draft:
> 
> * pdf:
> https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-gcdrb-te
> as-5g-network-slice-application-01-rev%20Med.pdf
> * doc:
> https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-gcdrb-te
> as-5g-network-slice-application-01-rev%20Med.doc
> 
> The flow of the draft is really hard to follow and the reasoning is not always
> that intuitive. I guess this is justified as this I-D is a merge (?) of many other
> documents.
> 
> The document can be enhanced by removing implementation details (including
> the digression on virtualization) and focus on the claimed scope: analyze the
> mapping between the 5G slice vs underlying transport slices + assess to what
> extent the Ep information as specified by the 3GPP is sufficient to trigger the
> provision of (transport) slices.
> 
> That's said, I support adopting this document assuming major rewrite effort
> will be needed to align with the intended scope + more focus on the gap
> analysis. The document can be even more better if it exercise the data models
> out there to assess if a 5G slice request can trigger ietf network slice service
> and attachment circuits service requests.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Teas <[e-mail]> De la part de IETF Secretariat
> > Envoyé : lundi 23 janvier 2023 13:21 À :
> > [e-mail]; teas-
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail] Objet : [Teas] The TEAS WG has placed
> > draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network- slice-application in state "Candidate for
> > WG Adoption"
> >
> >
> > The TEAS WG has placed draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network-slice-
> > application in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Oscar de
> > Dios)
> >
> > The document is available at
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gcdrb-teas-5g-network-
> > slice-application/
> >
> > Comment:
> > Pending IPR Call.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> _________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou
> copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le
> signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
> responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used
> or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this
> message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.