IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Network slicing framework : Issue #4: Describing the network slice service

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 27 September 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7AE3A0BA8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5SxTWd0BnQpD for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D283A0BA6 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 18RGnBW6016991; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:11 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844474604B; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ACD4604D; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (84.93.166.80.plusnet.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [84.93.166.80] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 18RGnAh6019235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:11 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>, 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vbeeram@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:49:09 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <051101d7b3bf$986f5ec0$c94e1c40$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: Adezvfcd94U5HfVASJ68EaL7SIweGg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.166.80
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.0.1018-26434.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.344-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.344-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.1018-26434.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.343600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: qdaeq83rogTP+Is0tbt5qXFPUrVDm6jtiRPU6vvejXJYbPLopoBzQgFI aO2IPt/7jlNk7ivox5BWdcIfVFWKVIgpnZdCLjHBEHAOi2uRs70j56rvFVgJ7Ec53z1aa/Ts9uk hOxuzDYjyTAheURKXPLtwqADTAhklj2hRzH1UwuA5f9Xw/xqKXc9jRarg90KM3n8eBZjGmUzkwj HXXC/4I8ZW5ai5WKlyUR1qnmeWNgVvoxkInj7R7bLqvDGiksuDmM5Vg0VXohvyjNzg9+xseaXU7 9a9DSYsj00kU/KsUFEuDgHqaPqiZxWqL8Ti0t7eVlxr1FJij9s=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Gh6Uk-SUzoLTawp8GGoZ2T5Qvm8>
Subject: [Teas] Network slicing framework : Issue #4: Describing the network slice service
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:49:17 -0000

Hi,

The current document describes the service in terms of:
- endpoints
- connectivity matrices
- SLOs/SLE

I believe that today's meeting had no objection to keeping this minimal
definition, and specifically that it would not be appropriate to put an
Information Model into the document.

Opinions are wanted to confirm this view (silence is consent!).

Pavan suggested that "a little more text may be needed" and I took this as
him volunteering to draft that text.

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email