[Teas] Status of some documents

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 17 July 2017 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20598131CBB; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6GaqsSeEW2n; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3B6E131C70; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6HGdSL0011372; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:39:28 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-8d56.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.141.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6HGdQwQ011346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:39:28 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:39:26 +0100
Message-ID: <03ac01d2ff1b$419fb070$c4df1150$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdL/GrxjW5Lj5TCHS/uHXvOWxz75EA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-23202.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.441-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.441-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: e0DaIq4smqfJ1LL8b7EekrmR+C0l9vjVDYBVKmbeeQO638ZUY6gSd4h0 yAYHjsqv4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt7bmZosI/5Zy3QfwsVk0UbuGrPnef/I+euTJelZNTznnp/Y zc3LoY2PMrEjtTmz+vFf7LEBaMnlb8F/Aa++FmM+nyLbqIYI358P9zZjybGuKTVn51J26DC9U11 F9HU0HTw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/M86_OjHBmrEBNxqzk-WeM-qlWgg>
Subject: [Teas] Status of some documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:39:32 -0000

I don't think I have anything exciting to say :-(

draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
Sent to AD
RTG Dir review done by Thomas Morin
Response email sent: no actions pending

draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources
Document complete
Still pending progress in PCE WG
PCE has now adopted draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00
So this I-D can advance "soon"

Adrian