[Teas] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-14
Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 05 March 2018 19:32 UTC
Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFFB12DA6B; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:32:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.74.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152027834027.31747.14180175871085676142@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:32:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/PRosk-yQ9vLZKIqZpY7EKFiUNJ4>
Subject: [Teas] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-14
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:32:27 -0000
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-?? Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2018-03-05 IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-27 IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08 Summary: This is much improved since the earlier version I reviewed. I do have a concern about the use of the term "egress" when I think that it should be "egress node" or some such other network object. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: The authors often use the term egress on its own when I think they mean egress PE or egress node or egress LSR. If my English concern is correct, this should be addressed before this goes to the RFC Editor else Auth48 will be a painful process for all concerned.
- [Teas] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Teas] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Teas] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of dr… Alissa Cooper