IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-13

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 14 February 2019 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426D91311CA; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:33:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuSFoPRAtTTI; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:33:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5ED1311C3; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1ELXFtJ003192; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:15 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8AC22044; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D850A22042; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.189.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1ELXDDa003794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:14 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang@ietf.org, 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <67adf787-e69b-3af8-8b49-5639833fda7a@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <67adf787-e69b-3af8-8b49-5639833fda7a@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:12 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <032601d4c4ac$e394dd30$aabe9790$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQG6b7o4vvogZ6UTMtzYOQtW5rqNcqYUeJpQ
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.189.92
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24430.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.496-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.496-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24430.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--9.495600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: u7Yf2n7Ca/3xIbpQ8BhdbGNW0DAjL5p+bv16+gil4jfb6Y+fnTZUL335 O+xpi5aI9PL90jNHlSPWxs2ZBAERyjqz4LAMi+1RYD9XTRdaMO0ZKp0SZ4P+dUX5hc8ioB2+ZwK fT86BI+GZDrHCDTDtcNSaoCOuud+skgHjBqPX6H0KYSf7LxJrxvaS52LUPfcSPILl10bYlyAwcW 27SU8AbtBiqcSOkqNp5uijUtF8lET51WNA1rE6t7xygpRxo4693Shyjq3SCxKvloAnGr4qhrghG 4lQCbFwukX23s/r39u2jpcAt+yxxX+OhC1J6Q0sngIgpj8eDcC063Wh9WVqgoou5V2iHBf1sOzO ncrmCoOOhzOa6g8KrYt2NMfbZ7zzaZ5UpZJkmnlLaWc3c+40SrH1h4PnEKZQV4jmTPGhHJ5DDKa 3G4nrLQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/QxaoiQFuqffWz32nkyL_EhN8rDs>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-13
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:33:21 -0000

Hi,

I reviewed and contributed to this document a couple of times as it
progressed, and made some relatively substantive suggestions which the
authors picked. That's probably why I'm listed as a contributor.

The architecture shown in Figure 2 seems to me to be consistent with the
ACTN work that this working group has produced, and that means that this
YANG model is important to cement the whole together and to provide an
important component for the usability of ACTN.

I support adoption.

Best,
Adrian
--
Want to buy a signed copy of a book of fairy stories for adults of all ages?
Send me an email and I'll bring one to Prague for you.
"Tales from the Wood"
"More Tales from the Wood"
"Tales from Beyond the Wood"
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: 14 February 2019 19:56
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs
<teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG adoption poll on
draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-13


All,

This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-13 a working group
document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or
"no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations
with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments
you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends February 28.

Thanks,

Lou (and Pavan)

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email