IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=8941d5ee39=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5801B12D1D8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBxfcY-x_ss4 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E86F12B05A for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u4DM45t4023533; Fri, 13 May 2016 18:07:57 -0400
Received: from mdwvexchht01.ciena.com (lin1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 22wnm18dtj-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 May 2016 18:07:57 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com (10.128.6.17) by MDWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.4.156.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.389.2; Fri, 13 May 2016 18:07:56 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT02.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2016 18:07:56 -0400
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:07:54 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
Thread-Index: AdGhjl9Lm9PlvphJRS+ulp168pRJsQL0mRkQ
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121C@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
References: <CA+YzgTsv1mZZhmeb_nDBZVQcopjb6AtizCy6McgNQwgYB42xhQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsv1mZZhmeb_nDBZVQcopjb6AtizCy6McgNQwgYB42xhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121CONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4179-8.000.1202-22320.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.472300-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-05-13_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1605130289
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/RaEuIz1OPpTafVJHD4BKX74Jnk0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:08:00 -0000

Sorry for the late reply.. (On PTO..)

While adding of “completion flag” (or similar to “partial bit” used in BGP) would have been a nice feature
to have, the SRLG collect draft by itself is an important feature to have, so..

I support progressing the document to publication.

Thanks,
Himanshu

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:42 PM
To: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

All,
This starts a two week working group last call on
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05.

The working group last call ends on Thursday, May 12th. Please
send your comments to the TEAS mailing list.

As is always the case, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this
document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.
Note, IPR has been disclosed on this draft.

Thanks,
Pavan (and Lou)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email