IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 14 May 2016 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB3212D133; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-gFkxFkV7a8; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364F912D098; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z184so2423735vkg.0; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=trORhkrao5904dz0c7ZsP5rTuJVOATJMRBTU48Chots=; b=u2qBUiTWAQHrSn6vdsQEuxjjedHXJMCWc8w3VtY+UU0EOu86LMcqVKSM94HmYuCYgB rMcNvYVILFra6f0oC+OEvuEq4EmLmBZNkLaK5dwAv19Ou31AvfYDqn9zzIVw9zDV12DK WPi1kG3h5f3fUrMgwmhAp5YWMbRuLzRbqnm0HRmV9n8bl4zwe8ZcJreq0i1GhzLEQT3w LLZ1zivmb3APK32ZpVSASuzZg8lTrVb0nYFe9amBuyKDsFMSAOvPBF5ScVQ68IfKPhMq 5wezFkvM773PLuHeUWiIFHxDy8aSPEc2JGKPsQ32fHfdahQG82+ZHAp+jc9d+9/mNRQZ Elvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=trORhkrao5904dz0c7ZsP5rTuJVOATJMRBTU48Chots=; b=RMQ0K4bO4EqdUejGL1Tb/sv94Fz6aiT/tBTs1b3fIbaa6Ys5kRtRCXcERGeB3WFylq ig3jJEPAMeyVAFVP0VWYvd0pMKhZlb4FMGoYGpMjC1SaOtkPxtdhBtA5tvkTWWX/G6q1 eC7qDWaWaVpeQSStZWkOW17CuO+xcaVjoaoChpX4JKYYsY2OW0HLh4fSLgPhfHg5jwZc MOTJGJ87A5s8tbDyCJ5Z7UgmaF4NDVd+p3wtf9JD3lic+zXBXOtjR+nqJOOJ22tsIL7a Nmuwk7ZQo8kgU5BuQqdsnCNeV8ywH8QMVXg28TSQuuYC5lF8E3QDEcsiDEJX0GUmv035 Cgdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW6HZLiLGGTXxU9SoUx+p0cY6/VBGc5uww4jvG2QnrO8f/o4DHCm1epXoDt16n1wt1dQABC0Y5aTreClg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.139.139 with SMTP id n133mr9456088vkd.71.1463184953083; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.67.196 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 17:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121C@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
References: <CA+YzgTsv1mZZhmeb_nDBZVQcopjb6AtizCy6McgNQwgYB42xhQ@mail.gmail.com> <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121C@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 20:15:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuznVofX6FgRAtP4d8hf0xueXwXS+_tfC7x-M3gak9+KA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11442a645e906f0532c24b02"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/mNJ5Rqy-fV0qLkft3lwkFFx9YIQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 00:15:59 -0000

The WG LC for this document is now closed.

Matt (and other authors),
Please go ahead and publish a new revision addressing the minor comments
received during the LC.

Regards,
-Pavan (and Lou)

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com> wrote:

> *Sorry for the late reply.. (On PTO..)*
>
>
>
> *While adding of “completion flag” (or similar to “partial bit” used in
> BGP) would have been a nice feature*
>
> *to have, the SRLG collect draft by itself is an important feature to
> have, so..*
>
>
>
> *I support progressing the document to publication.*
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Himanshu*
>
>
>
> *From:* Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Vishnu Pavan
> Beeram
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:42 PM
> *To:* teas@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
>
>
>
> All,
>
> This starts a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05.
>
> The working group last call ends on Thursday, May 12th. Please
> send your comments to the TEAS mailing list.
>
> As is always the case, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this
> document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>
> Note, IPR has been disclosed on this draft.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan (and Lou)
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email