[Teas] Onwards with draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 02 August 2021 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC3D3A1DB2; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dFzI5Uqy3saq; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C6A3A1DAE; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com []) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 172Lg9mD016229; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:09 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D985C4604B; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3234604A; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 172Lg7O4002987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:08 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: <teas@ietf.org>, <draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:42:07 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <12c101d787e7$3e81d450$bb857cf0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdeH5dvlKG5FHhINRKGNGeUn5HuC8g==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.285-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.285-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.285100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: RTC/st8+7P8RyMhUs53hntehVfsWM2EFpWOBfK9L1z+G2OLeBcPAUZgU Ly4zAbFBgH8XNFUdnlxD5q/aHXQ9mJ4zieNkYYVBt0cS/uxH87CxvbHnNOXYQYpc3JtqeiRPjNi 7p86WOsgmEveEgtwQnRDNwgrB/Xu0x8WFTbruCgKPR2u912hYREv3HgUK4EtRaYn7tXmtFzOGPn eCOFgqRFozlTt1FeqbkZOl7WKIImqqZ6/l55ohA1OrNp5VU581+gtHj7OwNO2OhzOa6g8KrXaTy mVPtKBt9xwcnSnUJafcdQnC7o126xsFAtNk+qvXapH4wcX6bCqhjtO/p57y9XYzcGRN8FHd0XDB u5ZkYufZu6f9WS6ZpSXidVjAhEZBrX7cmKNisA4yqaEb8zSjj/QwfDO7YmjAf+weolWHdq6UTGV AhB5EbQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/STctZIJHact_-pHGX936phQbP5g>
Subject: [Teas] Onwards with draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 21:42:18 -0000

If I recall correctly, Dan presented three options for what to do with this
draft when he presented last week.

Option 1: Drop the document and move the useful contents into another I-D,
if so which one?
Option 2: Adopt to TEAS WG and have the WG help develop and publish the I-D.
Option 3: Do nothing.

I commented against option 1.
Joel said he supported option 2.
Lou noted "We generally adopt and re-arrange later. So generally follow
option 2."

In cases further formal requests are needed, the authors would like to ask
for adoption.