[Teas] draft-bestbar-teas-yang-topology-filter -- Dhruv's question from TEAS 112 WG session
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Wed, 10 November 2021 12:48 UTC
Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87AA3A0EEE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:48:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bkmJUcGPBaw for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:48:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF7B3A0EEC for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:48:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id x10so2604412ioj.9 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:48:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dQ0GeUqDL3dmu37i5EKHAr+OCFjisUJX+T5E6JKpYHE=; b=WiVGNkL8PwQxdwVXKx+iXpUzeiTzheUHDIvtSfxNoCmuHrbnzdfTjocPkP6oU6pbYi tsJ7+vb+e0HKCBKsGME2/0fp11wGtNptmiA3F9zoXoRDJcPtVFTLiu5bTXFv74ppR4lu vVCmiyz26ID+ndNgWVNgnibvBSmPpSoDkzhc+jkAKMbDaZqJBxg8ptsqHLW67ZikV7rV aJT3babBjx0hjtVSiml9wY/l8rcSvbD6XxqdPQLBKasCgurwuiZSPi5qj3m4SSzjRfLE CvYslFblSk86YncpTSIMo60OUIrxHsdeXiAp6k54WRKtwkkLzl7t2jefB/dkfV5m+N5u Vg4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dQ0GeUqDL3dmu37i5EKHAr+OCFjisUJX+T5E6JKpYHE=; b=zyzERv1c9nwp6hVh0j/rduzJDwttJLtoRf81AqHTkVyZccyMGyZSLBIwbucce5JXYz PYpEJitow7x6SkaKKTTyANYXKsVU0CSkcbezLmraGPQttck3RoDsZZ6CDLALBeNhjzfR hUWMKCXUoouQddzxXH/jyV4Pg757bcBQ9NmqDv0veT+SXLGykzH+fJZeFwGrg8ny8p0V jvqa9sLtPX/zdcTKJ4Ct+XdAJLIPaHMTCLs/BEt7jO7KNQdMYLiDtN1uylaxEAnohWqZ ratlUxBUvJAerzMShSM+0XKEbm67BFRuHL9rCm33fPGCE0Ngao+7vbzPQ5Ot/hmU4WUt 1aCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LDhMLndS60dw1QN/y0GYdIUDsJqI6MbrCaSIry132IcLWXxGE 0Zh32PbN8Ez6Shzwyb2DNdQz+TaOQH2BywnDSX1OaQTz/YcmnDIQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYH2FV8vrQsiLtRLC6KDcEmxCxVR6Xb+ImWTOepCnmSYNLEMGByO13nzW9v5z5T7PH3rCV3FdV15S5K3tOcbw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:358b:: with SMTP id v11mr11553612jal.53.1636548508944; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:48:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:48:17 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTt6EpOKZitz9cmPVKwLyymNFn1VPbHe0bSVXoyG5saC4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000888a7d05d06ea4cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Th8zPD5UWb7H8YQ3R6UtO1e2-uc>
Subject: [Teas] draft-bestbar-teas-yang-topology-filter -- Dhruv's question from TEAS 112 WG session
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:48:37 -0000
>From Jabber logs: >>[17:55:21] <~~dhruv~~dhody> The question I wanted to ask was related to the PCE topology filter (a new draft on the agenda) which seems to be about using TOPOLOGY object as constraint during path computation, where as here it is use as a way to filter topology to create a sub-topology. Important to keep these two use in mind to avoid any inconsistencies later on! Dhruv, The PCEP document ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-01 <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SLx4YasSciUJVzFDv4qOBtx8_KQYBTrn2X9Wdi2oJADGiN0j0gbeKWACKlSgV_PP$>) is expected to be consistent with the data model specified in draft-bestbar-teas-yang-topology-filter (agree that it is important to maintain consistency between these two drafts). Please check out my response to Loa on the path-computation specific use-case (the examples should clarify the intent). Regards, -Pavan (as co-author)
- [Teas] draft-bestbar-teas-yang-topology-filter --… Vishnu Pavan Beeram