Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 07 May 2022 21:22 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F67C14F726; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sDr7FiS5xB7Z; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09449C14F725; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 247LM9sd022414; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:22:09 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC85A4604B; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:22:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AA24603D; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:22:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 7 May 2022 22:22:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (229.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.229] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 247LM7Rm014050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 May 2022 22:22:08 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <697d8174-8d33-d77f-fb1b-69b13481ff89@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <697d8174-8d33-d77f-fb1b-69b13481ff89@labn.net>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 22:22:09 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <016701d86258$82eace20$88c06a60$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQDLkkKgDrsWtmpfNRmodmNU40paM68tizeQ
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.229
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26880.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.297-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.297-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26880.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.297100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: UuaOI1zLN1jxIbpQ8BhdbDjNGpWCIvfTsBSA1tuZVSZ0Tsch72XSbJ0+ obfADoH/Anr23OaRXtIWYKtyuSoio8c+PMzMRNB9+Fq9Vk/m1Nqw3iTAeaNpMEh1t6yz8ofFJxt aZTnkU6sDCvV3UwP6eL5s5cMdFEFoujJMOGTTiDKfgML7lG8+KVNkVKKJON2eShS1xYMAnypif9 fhyqj7/CB6sKA1i/K0OvJuZuh8AdUf41Ow0sRYU44V8tCoXo/S2aGwk4OLNSzk++hGM2nSe493W UsgC0XiUf5Rc7fZG8u6lkhhsb0M/ORjLMcI9BOMuFdP7vaalM32kudi1D33EkukIs3g1HjeJEeu WJQ2lK3i8zVgXoAltlwtzewu2M630KkIUsNMdlTdB/CxWTRRu/558CedkGIvqcoAhihTwvgE36i aG1zeuIN8vd0GhCVQO9I42knCO0Pi9JMpvXEBseidhXOKPelU
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/UEqMxXnxjweWQQjSbJNOy1bofyY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 21:22:17 -0000
Hi, Responding on this oldish thread. I've been added as a Contributor in the -09 revision, so ... I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: 09 February 2022 12:53 To: Bin_Wen@cable.comcast.com; cbarth@juniper.net; chen.ran@zte.com.cn; csekar@juniper.net; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; jie.dong@huawei.com; joel.halpern@ericsson.com; luay.jalil@verizon.com; luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com; peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn; reza.rokui@nokia.com; ssangli@juniper.net; tsaad@juniper.net; vbeeram@juniper.net; xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08 Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Lou (Co-Chair) PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. _______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
- [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns-pac… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Colby Barth
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Srihari Sangli
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Chandrasekar Ramachandran
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] [**EXTERNAL**] Regarding IPR on draft-… Rokui, Reza
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-tea… Jalil, Luay
- Re: [Teas] [EXTERNAL] RE: Regarding IPR on draft-… Wen, Bin
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… chen.ran
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bestbar-teas-ns… Adrian Farrel