Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-liu-teas-yang-sr-te-topo

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> Sat, 23 December 2017 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9360120454 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:07:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s5vMkQ0oWHZW for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655C11201F2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D2E2B72EA3941 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:06:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:06:59 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.83]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:06:51 -0800
From: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
To: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>, "xufeng_liu@jabil.com" <xufeng_liu@jabil.com>, Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>, "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "tsaad@cisco.com" <tsaad@cisco.com>, "hshah@ciena.com" <hshah@ciena.com>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
CC: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-liu-teas-yang-sr-te-topo
Thread-Index: AQHTe1X7WF7DIjr7VUax9snW5of7YqNQDTED
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:06:51 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.5a3d9e3f.5aaafcdf.fa1@localhost>
References: <e2ecb998-aa18-6353-d1f5-b0466cf86990@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <e2ecb998-aa18-6353-d1f5-b0466cf86990@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan5a3d9e3f5aaafcdffa1localhost_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Wy3KSfmC6W5NHDRIoGUvYOATGIg>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-liu-teas-yang-sr-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:07:04 -0000

No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Igor
From:Lou Berger
To:xufeng_liu@jabil.com,Igor Bryskin,vbeeram@juniper.net,tsaad@cisco.com,hshah@ciena.com,stephane.litkowski@orange.com,
Cc:TEAS WG,
Date:2017-12-22 13:52:15
Subject:[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-liu-teas-yang-sr-te-topo


Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of preparation for WG Adoption

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas