IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] DC topo model

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 28 July 2023 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40392C151061 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKNVXWjf8ZU1 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5383C14CE33 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 36SIPfGX014331; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F4E4604A; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674A24604D; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ioxnode2.iomartmail.com (ioxnode2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 36SIPfrL012690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:25:41 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1378735280.756348.1690568741136@www.getmymail.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev44
X-Originating-IP: 31.133.128.130
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=date :from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20221128; bh=XzHsXnflURqfrmQzubNxz FYK4bhMY9vsDyjqYNgaOR0=; b=2ARBEaqXhuMR1zef/uQGoBMukznB8maLUQGKw rhh/mG8YGBhhBAbrc1GU5KgUo3E5bbphhG2DRxq8X1JafeXkst51J5YSMgM9a/IH ZruFWPUEp1j1WUbz4GphYST7wywHP6DLe2r6F1I793j5xcwSPGqHIFeDhGS9gPVV 8lnV6xwt5CzpAGYZvF75Y+4EVRg22OizA0FRPgpVeupb97lRfDoUEgP05/CJJ8Js ahO/DliBDMmHS18leXyceBcyey+tknyp0BdI76KkUVYPTJIuha/MjtpeNC1fvdo1 7/k9rwRHbmv7DxiocRgndz2Ctz/jfy1v1A4apADQQJe71IkqA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27780.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.461-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No-0.461-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27780.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10-0.460500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: ZTA/MMaLkmM25XOhnouJ5fx0ykrbAxjCqwU71dzr0StP0rL0CMv7cplA 4IpB7gNOJjdZvprOsDzVGk64c676ZkX9O+Mf2vo5L4+sB3yBsckqs+sOb/Dxcx8VihOGA1phXFT Ho1zeSS8upH6zaKcivaTiil5doQQZsZWIO/T108vHM1p4NoWyg2P/IYHnyZ+wP4H+2nyK0FPZ/d KwTCA/v/doK1MEIGGXxoZxNHb/9nlccQ8eam5EfTl/1fD/GopdnCGS1WQEGtBp9JuvPBKN/Pzff z+WOOti
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/X0jwRzs8amccL2M7LTGhPYZKizU>
Subject: [Teas] DC topo model
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:25:49 -0000

I was happily dozing at the back of the meeting when the AD woke me up to ask about the overlap between draft-llc-teas-dc-aware-topo-model and CATS
 
My initial reaction was that it may be closer to IVY, but on re-reading I see that it does use the word "compute"
 
I think a lot of the question comes to who might consume this model. Is it intended to provide a picture of the DC for the DC's operator, for other control processes within the DC, or for consumers outside the DC?
 
I think the draft should answer that question to give scope to how the model will be used and what it should contain
 
Cheers,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email